Proposition 9
Tag 0AXF, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AXF].
Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VI, § 2. Affine Weyl group
Let V be a real vector space of finite dimension l, and let G be a finite subgroup of , generated by reflections and essential. Give V a scalar product invariant under G. The following conditions are equivalent:
(i) There exists a discrete subgroup of V of rank l that is stable under G. (ii) There exists a -structure on V (Algebra, Chap. II, § 8, no. 1, Def. 1) invariant under G. (iii) There exists a root system in V whose Weyl group is G. (iv) There exists a discrete group of displacements of V, acting properly on V, and generated by reflections, such that is the semi-direct product of G and a group of translations of rank l.
(ii) (i): let be a -structure on V invariant under G. Let A be a finite subset of generating the -vector space . Replacing A by , we can assume that A is stable under G. Let B be the subgroup of V generated by A. Then B is stable under G, of finite type and torsion-free, so has a basis over which is both a basis of over and a basis of V over .
(iii) (ii): this follows from Prop. 1 of § 1, no. 1, for example. (iv) (iii): let be a group satisfying condition (iv). The group of translations of is of rank l, and 0 is a special point for by Prop. 9 of Chap. V, § 3, no. 10. Prop. 6 shows that there exists a reduced root system in such that is identified with ; the group G is then the Weyl group of the inverse root system of .
(i) (iv): assume that G leaves stable a discrete subgroup M of V, of rank l. For any reflection , for all , so the line orthogonal to meets M; let be the generators of the cyclic group ; the set A of the and is stable under G, hence generates a subgroup of M stable under G; the discrete group is of rank l because G is essential. Let be the group of affine transformations of V that is the semi-direct product of G and the group of translations whose vectors belong to . Let be the subgroup of generated by the reflections of . We shall show that , which will complete the proof. First, since G is generated by reflections. On the other hand, for any reflection s of G, let be the translation with vector . The transformation is a reflection, and ; thus is a product of two reflections of ; this being true for every reflection s of G, the translations whose vector belongs to are all in .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.