Proposition 1
Tag 0BHC, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BHC].
General Topology, chapter III, § 1. Topologies on groups
Let be a group and let be a filter on satisfying the axioms , and . Then there is a unique topology on , compatible with the group structure of , for which is the neighbourhood filter of the identity element . For this topology the neighbourhood filter of any point is the same as each of the two filters and .
If there is a topology with the required properties, then by what has been said above the neighbourhood filter of coincides with each of the filters and ; hence the topology is unique, if it exists. Its existence will be established if we show 1) that the filters are the neighbourhood filters of a topology on , and 2) that this topology is compatible with the group structure of .
1) The filter satisfies axiom (see Chapter I § 1, no. 2) by reason of and , as we have already seen; hence to show that is the neighbourhood filter of in a topology on , we have to verify axiom . Let then be any set of , and a set of such that ; then for any we have , so that belongs to the filter ; hence is satisfied.
2) Let us now show that the topology defined by the neighbourhood filters satisfies . Let be any two points of ; if we put and , then we have to show that is as near as we please to whenever and are close enough to . Now ; let be any neighbourhood of , then we shall have if , and by reason of . But by and there exists such that ; hence it is enough to take and in order to have . This completes the proof.
A common method of defining a topology compatible with a group structure on consists in giving a filter satisfying the axioms , and . The corresponding conditions for a filter base are as follows:
Given any , there exists such that .
(GV_{II}). Given any , there exists such that .
(GV'_{III}). Given any and any , there exists such that .
A neighbourhood of which coincides with its image under the symmetry is said to be symmetric. If is any neighbourhood of , then , and are symmetric neighbourhoods. By (GV_{II}), the symmetric neighbourhoods form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of . Also it follows from (GV_{I}) that when runs through a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of , the sets (where is a fixed integer ) form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.