Example
Tag 0BHG, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BHG].
General Topology, chapter III, § 1. Topologies on groups
Definition of a topology on a group by means of a set of subgroups. If is a filter base on a group , formed of subgroups of , then it is immediately seen that satisfies axioms (GV_{I}) and (GV_{II}), since for any subgroup of . Hence the set will be a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of in a topology compatible with the group structure of , provided that satisfies (GV_{III}); this will in particular be the case if all the subgroups in are normal, hence always if is commutative. The topology thus defined is Hausdorff, by Proposition 2, if and only if the intersection of all the subgroups in consists only of . The most interesting cases are those in which the subgroup is not in (otherwise the topology defined by is the discrete topology): if , the topology defined by is Hausdorff only if is an infinite set.
Since the intersection of two subgroups is a subgroup, we can define a topology on , compatible with its group structure, starting from any set of subgroups of : let be the set of all subgroups , where and , and let be the set of all finite intersections of subgroups belonging to . Then is a filter base and satisfies (GV).
Consider in particular the additive group of a ring . Every set of ideals of defines a topology compatible with this additive group structure. This topology is Hausdorff if the intersection of all the ideals of is the zero ideal, and it is not discrete if no finite intersection of the ideals of is the zero ideal. Topologies defined in this way play a large part in the theory of numbers (see the Exercises of §§ 6 and 7 of this chapter).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.