Let N and L be two groups, e′ and e′′ their respective identity elements. Suppose that we are given a homomorphism y→σy of L into the group Γ of automorphisms of N. Then:
1) On the product set S=N×L, the internal law of composition
(x,y)(x′,y′)=(xσy(x′),yy′) defines a group structure, for which j1:x→(x,e′′) is an isomorphism of N onto a normal subgroup of S, j2:y→(e′,y) is an isomorphism of L onto a subgroup of S, and pr2:S→L is a surjective homomorphism whose kernel is j1(N) and which is such that pr2∘j2 is the identity automorphism of L.
2) Let f:N→G, g:L→G be two homomorphisms into a group G, such that
f(σy(x))=g(y)f(x)g(y−1) for all x∈N and all y∈L. Then there is a unique homomorphism h:S→G such that f=h∘j1, and g=h∘j2.
If x,x′,x′′ are elements of N and y,y′,y′′ are elements of L, then
((x,y)(x′,y′))(x′′,y′′)=(xσy(x′),yy′)(x′′,y′′)=(xσy(x′)σy′(x′′),yy′y′′) and
(x,y)((x′,y′)(x′′,y′′))=(x,y)(x′σy′(x′′),y′y′′)=(xσy(x′σy′(x′′)),yy′,y′′) and therefore the associativity of the law (3) follows from the facts that
y→σy is a homomorphism of
L into
Γ and that
σy is an automorphism of
N. Clearly
(e′,e′′) is the identity element of (3), and finally
(x,y)(σy−1(x−1),y−1)=(σy−1(x−1),y−1)(x,y)=(e′,e′′) so that
(x,y) has an inverse in
S. The other assertions of 1) are clear. On the other hand, since
(x,y)=(x,e′′)(e′,y), a homomorphism
h which satisfies the conditions of 2) must necessarily satisfy
h(x,y)=f(x)g(y), hence is unique if it exists; moreover it is immediate from (4) that
f(xσy(x′))g(yy′)=f(x)g(y)f(x′)g(y−1)g(y)g(y′)=f(x)g(y)f(x′)g(y′)
which shows that (x,y)→f(x)g(y) is indeed a homomorphism of S into G satisfying the conditions of 2).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.