Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 0BML, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BML].

General Topology, chapter III, § 5. Infinite sums in commutative groups

Let (xi)i∈I(x_i)_{i \in I} be a family of points of a group GG, and let (Iλ)λ∈L(I_\lambda)_{\lambda \in L} be a finite partition of II. If each of the subfamilies (xi)i∈Iλ(x_i)_{i \in I_\lambda} is summable, then the family (xi)i∈I(x_i)_{i \in I} is summable and the formula (1) is valid.

It is enough to prove the proposition when L=(1,2)L = (1,2); having done so, we then proceed by induction on the number of elements of LL. Let s1=∑i∈I1xis_1 = \sum_{i \in I_1} x_i and s2=∑i∈I2xis_2 = \sum_{i \in I_2} x_i. For each neighbourhood VV of the origin, there is a finite subset J1J_1 (resp. J2J_2) of I1I_1 (resp. I2I_2) such that, for each finite subset H1H_1 (resp. H2H_2) of I1I_1 (resp. I2I_2) containing J1J_1 (resp. J2J_2), we have ∑i∈H1xi∈S1+V\sum_{i \in H_1} x_i \in S_1 + V (resp. ∑i∈H2xi∈s2+V\sum_{i \in H_2} x_i \in s_2 + V). If we put J0=J1∪J2J_0 = J_1 \cup J_2, it follows that, for each finite subset HH of II which contains J0J_0, we have ∑i∈Hxi∈S1+s2+V+V\sum_{i \in H} x_i \in S_1 + s_2 + V + V, and the result follows.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.