Theorem 1
Tag 0BNF, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BNF].
General Topology, chapter III, § 6. Topological groups with operators; topological rings division rings and fields
Let E, F, G be three complete Hausdorff commutative groups; let A be a dense subgroup of E and let B be a dense subgroup of F. If f is a continuous -bilinear (*) mapping of into G, then f can be extended by continuity to a continuous -bilinear mapping of into G.
Let be an arbitrary point of , and let be the traces on A, B respectively of the neighbourhood filters of ( are filters, by hypothesis). To show that f can be extended by continuity, it is enough to show that is a Cauchy filter-base on G (Chapter II, § 3, no. 6, Proposition 11). Consider the identity
We shall show that by taking and in a sufficiently small set of , and by choosing and suitably, we can make each of the terms on the right-hand side very small. Let W be any neighbourhood of 0 in G; since f is continuous at , there is a set and a set such that whenever . Take a point and a point ; then for all in U and all in V we shall have
On the other hand, the partial mapping is continuous on A; hence there is a set , belonging to , and such that, whenever and belong to , we have . Likewise there exists belonging to such that, whenever and belong to , we have . Consequently, if and are any two points of , then
this proves the existence of the extension of f. The fact that is -bilinear is an immediate consequence of the principle of extension of identities (Chapter I, § 8, no. 1, Corollary 1 to Proposition 2).
Q.E.D.
In the application of this theorem to a Hausdorff topological ring A, we take E, F and G to be , A and B to be the ring A, and f to be
(*) is said to be -bilinear if, for all elements of A and all elements we have
the -bilinear mapping , which by hypothesis is continuous. We denote again by the value of the extended function on ; this function is a law of composition on , and to say that it is -bilinear means that it is distributive on both sides with respect to addition; and it is also associative, by the principle of extension of identities. Consequently:
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.