Bourbaki

Remark

Tag 0BNK, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BNK].

General Topology, chapter III, § 6. Topological groups with operators; topological rings division rings and fields

Given a topological ring AA, consider, on a left AA-module EE, a topology compatible with the additive group structure of EE. By virtue of the identity

λx−λ0x0=(λ−λ0)x0+λ0(x−x0)+(λ−λ0)(x−x0) \lambda x - \lambda_0 x_0 = (\lambda - \lambda_0)x_0 + \lambda_0(x - x_0) + (\lambda - \lambda_0)(x - x_0)
the axiom (MT) is equivalent to the conjunction of the following three axioms: (MTI′_I'). For each x0∈Ex_0 \in E, the mapping λ→λx0\lambda \to \lambda x_0 is continuous at the point λ=0\lambda = 0. (MTII′_{II}'). For each λ0∈A\lambda_0 \in A, the mapping x→λ0xx \to \lambda_0 x is continuous at the point x=0x = 0. (MTIII′_{III}'). The mapping (λ,x)→λx(\lambda, x) \to \lambda x is continuous at the point (0,0)(0, 0).

We deduce from this a necessary and sufficient set of conditions that the filter B\mathfrak{B} of neighbourhoods of 00 in an AA*-module* EE must satisfy in order to define a topology on EE compatible with its module structure; B\mathfrak{B} must satisfy the axioms (GAI_I) and (GAII_{II}) of §1§ 1, no. 2, and in addition must satisfy the following three axioms: (MVI_I). For each x0∈Ex_0 \in E and V∈BV \in \mathfrak{B}, there is a neighbourhood SS of 00 in AA such that S.x0⊂VS.x_0 \subset V. (MVII_{II}). For each λ0∈A\lambda_0 \in A and V∈BV \in \mathfrak{B}, there exists W∈BW \in \mathfrak{B} such that λ0W⊂V\lambda_0 W \subset V. (MVIII_{III}). For each V∈BV \in \mathfrak{B} there exists U∈BU \in \mathfrak{B} and a neighbourhood TT of 00 in AA such that T.U⊂VT.U \subset V.

Every commutative topological group is a topological Z\mathbf{Z}-module when the ring Z\mathbf{Z} is given the discrete topology.

If MM is a submodule of a topological AA-module EE, it is clear that the topology induced on MM by the topology of EE is compatible with the module structure of MM. Moreover, on the quotient AA-module E/ME/M, the topology which is the quotient by MM of the topology of EE is compatible with the AA-module structure. To see this it is enough to show that the mapping (λ,x)→λx(\lambda, x) \to \lambda x of A×(E/M)A \times (E/M) onto E/ME/M is continuous (where x→x′x \to x' denotes the canonical mapping of EE onto E/ME/M). Now, since we may identify the additive topological groups A×(E/M)A \times (E/M) and (A×E)/({0}×M)(A \times E)/(\{0\} \times M) (§ 2, no. 9, Corollary to Proposition 26), it is enough to show that the mapping (λ,x)→λx′(\lambda, x) \to \lambda x' of A×EA \times E into E/ME/M is continuous; and this is immediate, since the mapping in question is the composition of x→x′x \to x' and (λ,x)→λx(\lambda, x) \to \lambda x.

Let (Ei)i∈I(E_i)_{i \in I} be an arbitrary family of topological AA-modules, and let E=∏i∈IEiE = \prod_{i \in I} E_i be the AA-module which is the product of the EiE_i. Then the product topology on EE is compatible with the AA-module structure of EE. To prove this it is enough to show that the mapping (λ,x)→(λ⋅prix)i∈I(\lambda, x) \to (\lambda \cdot \mathrm{pr}_i x)_{i \in I} of A×EA \times E into EE is continuous, or (by Proposition 1 of Chapter I, § 4, no. 1) that for each index x∈Ix \in I the mapping (λ,x)→λ⋅prxx(\lambda, x) \to \lambda \cdot \mathrm{pr}_x x is a continuous mapping of A×EA \times E into ExE_x; but this mapping is the composition of (λ,xx)→λxx(\lambda, x_x) \to \lambda x_x and (λ,x)→(λ,prxx)(\lambda, x) \to (\lambda, \mathrm{pr}_x x), both of which are continuous.

Let AA be a Hausdorff topological ring and EE a Hausdorff topological AA-module. Let E^\hat{E} be the additive group which is the completion of the commutative topological group EE (§ 3, no. 5, Theorem 2). The Z\mathbf{Z}-bilinear mapping (λ,x)→λx(\lambda, x) \to \lambda x of the product A×EA \times E of the additive groups A,EA, E into the additive group EE can be extended by continuity to a Z\mathbf{Z}-bilinear mapping of A^×E^\hat{A} \times \hat{E} into E^\hat{E} (no. 5, Theorem 1), and this mapping we continue to denote by (λ,x)→λx(\lambda, x) \to \lambda x. By virtue of the principle of extension of identities, we have λ(μx)=(λμ)x\lambda (\mu x) = (\lambda \mu) x for λ∈A^,μ∈A^\lambda \in \hat{A}, \mu \in \hat{A} and x∈E^x \in \hat{E}, and 1⋅x=x1 \cdot x = x for all x∈E^x \in \hat{E}; the external law (λ,x)→λx(\lambda, x) \to \lambda x therefore defines an A^\hat{A}-module structure on E^\hat{E} compatible with its topology. The topological A^\hat{A}-module E^\hat{E} thus defined is called the completion of the topological AA-module EE.

Let EE be a topological module over a topological ring AA, where neither AA nor EE is necessarily Hausdorff. Let NN (resp. FF) be the closure of {0}\{0\} in AA (resp. EE). NN is a two-sided ideal of AA (no. 4, Proposition 5) and FF is a sub-AA-module of EE (no. 1, Proposition 1); furthermore, by continuity we have λx∈F\lambda x \in F whenever λ∈N\lambda \in N or x∈Fx \in F. We can therefore define, by passing to the quotients, a mapping (λ˙,x˙)→λ˙x˙(\dot{\lambda}, \dot{x}) \to \dot{\lambda} \dot{x} of (A/N)×(E/F)(A/N) \times (E/F) into E/FE/F; it is easily verified (by use of the Corollary to Proposition 26 of § 2, no. 9) that this mapping is continuous, and therefore defines a structure of a topological (A/N)(A/N)-module on E/FE/F. If we put B=A/NB = A/N and L=E/FL = E/F, then the BB-module LL is called the Hausdorff module associated with EE; its completion L^\hat{L} is a topological module over the Hausdorff completion A^\hat{A} (equal by definition to B^\hat{B}) of AA (no. 5), and this module L^\hat{L} is called the Hausdorff completion of EE and is denoted by E^\hat{E}. We see as in , no. 4, Proposition 8 that every continuous homomorphism u:E→Gu : E \to G of EE into a complete Hausdorff A^\hat{A}-module GG factorizes uniquely into u=v∘φu = v \circ \varphi, where vv is a continuous homomorphism of E^\hat{E} into GG and φ\varphi is the canonical mapping of EE into E^\hat{E}. We conclude that if E,E′E, E' are two topological AA-modules and u:E→E′u : E \to E' is a continuous homomorphism, then there is a unique continuous homomorphism u^:E^→E^′\hat{u} : \hat{E} \to \hat{E}' such that the diagram

E→uE′↓φ↓φ′E^→u^E^′ \begin{array}{ccc} E & \xrightarrow{u} & E' \\ \downarrow \varphi & & \downarrow \varphi' \\ \hat{E} & \xrightarrow{\hat{u}} & \hat{E}' \end{array}

is commutative, φ\varphi and φ′\varphi' being the canonical mappings.

The definitions and results of this section apply equally well to pseudo-modules over an arbitrary topological ring, by deleting all mention of the identity element of the ring.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.