Remark
Tag 0BNK, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BNK].
General Topology, chapter III, § 6. Topological groups with operators; topological rings division rings and fields
Given a topological ring , consider, on a left -module , a topology compatible with the additive group structure of . By virtue of the identity
We deduce from this a necessary and sufficient set of conditions that the filter of neighbourhoods of in an *-module* must satisfy in order to define a topology on compatible with its module structure; must satisfy the axioms (GA) and (GA) of , no. 2, and in addition must satisfy the following three axioms: (MV). For each and , there is a neighbourhood of in such that . (MV). For each and , there exists such that . (MV). For each there exists and a neighbourhood of in such that .
Every commutative topological group is a topological -module when the ring is given the discrete topology.
If is a submodule of a topological -module , it is clear that the topology induced on by the topology of is compatible with the module structure of . Moreover, on the quotient -module , the topology which is the quotient by of the topology of is compatible with the -module structure. To see this it is enough to show that the mapping of onto is continuous (where denotes the canonical mapping of onto ). Now, since we may identify the additive topological groups and (§ 2, no. 9, Corollary to Proposition 26), it is enough to show that the mapping of into is continuous; and this is immediate, since the mapping in question is the composition of and .
Let be an arbitrary family of topological -modules, and let be the -module which is the product of the . Then the product topology on is compatible with the -module structure of . To prove this it is enough to show that the mapping of into is continuous, or (by Proposition 1 of Chapter I, § 4, no. 1) that for each index the mapping is a continuous mapping of into ; but this mapping is the composition of and , both of which are continuous.
Let be a Hausdorff topological ring and a Hausdorff topological -module. Let be the additive group which is the completion of the commutative topological group (§ 3, no. 5, Theorem 2). The -bilinear mapping of the product of the additive groups into the additive group can be extended by continuity to a -bilinear mapping of into (no. 5, Theorem 1), and this mapping we continue to denote by . By virtue of the principle of extension of identities, we have for and , and for all ; the external law therefore defines an -module structure on compatible with its topology. The topological -module thus defined is called the completion of the topological -module .
Let be a topological module over a topological ring , where neither nor is necessarily Hausdorff. Let (resp. ) be the closure of in (resp. ). is a two-sided ideal of (no. 4, Proposition 5) and is a sub--module of (no. 1, Proposition 1); furthermore, by continuity we have whenever or . We can therefore define, by passing to the quotients, a mapping of into ; it is easily verified (by use of the Corollary to Proposition 26 of § 2, no. 9) that this mapping is continuous, and therefore defines a structure of a topological -module on . If we put and , then the -module is called the Hausdorff module associated with ; its completion is a topological module over the Hausdorff completion (equal by definition to ) of (no. 5), and this module is called the Hausdorff completion of and is denoted by . We see as in , no. 4, Proposition 8 that every continuous homomorphism of into a complete Hausdorff -module factorizes uniquely into , where is a continuous homomorphism of into and is the canonical mapping of into . We conclude that if are two topological -modules and is a continuous homomorphism, then there is a unique continuous homomorphism such that the diagram
is commutative, and being the canonical mappings.
The definitions and results of this section apply equally well to pseudo-modules over an arbitrary topological ring, by deleting all mention of the identity element of the ring.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.