Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 0BOG, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BOG].

General Topology, chapter III, § 7. Inverse limits of topological groups and rings

Suppose that the XαX_\alpha and the GαG_\alpha satisfy the above hypotheses.

a) If the stabilizer of each point of XαX_\alpha is a compact subgroup of GαG_\alpha for each α∈I\alpha \in I, then the stabilizer of each point x=(xα)x = (x_\alpha) of XX is a compact subgroup of GG; the orbit of xx (with respect to GG) is canonically homeomorphic to the inverse limit of the orbits of the xαx_\alpha (with respect to GαG_\alpha); and the canonical mapping h:X/G→lim←⁡Xα/Gαh : X/G \to \varprojlim X_\alpha/G_\alpha is injective.

b) If, for each α∈I\alpha \in I, every orbit of a point of XαX_\alpha (with respect to GαG_\alpha) is compact, then every orbit of a point of XX (with respect to GG) is relatively compact, and hh is surjective. If also hh is bijective, then every orbit of a point of XX is compact.

Let x=(xα)∈Xx = (x_\alpha) \in X, and for each α∈I\alpha \in I let Xα′=Gα⋅xαX'_\alpha = G_\alpha \cdot x_\alpha be the orbit of xαx_\alpha. If α≤β\alpha \leq \beta, it follows from (i) and the relation gαβ(xβ)=xαg_{\alpha\beta}(x_\beta) = x_\alpha that gαβ(Xβ′)⊂Xα′g_{\alpha\beta}(X'_\beta) \subset X'_\alpha, and hence that (Xα′)(X'_\alpha) is an inverse system of subsets of the XαX_\alpha. For each α∈I\alpha \in I let uα:Gα→Xα′u_\alpha : G_\alpha \to X'_\alpha be the continuous mapping sα→sα⋅xαs_\alpha \to s_\alpha \cdot x_\alpha; the uαu_\alpha form an inverse system of mappings, and u=lim←⁡uαu = \varprojlim u_\alpha is the continuous mapping s→s.xs \to s.x of GG into the subspace X′=lim←⁡Xα′X' = \varprojlim X'_\alpha of XX. The hypothesis of a) implies that u‾α(yα)\overline{u}_\alpha(y_\alpha) is compact for each yα∈Xα′y_\alpha \in X'_\alpha. Since also uαu_\alpha is surjective, the conditions of Chapter I, § 9, no. 6, Proposition 8, Corollary 2 are satisfied, and the first two assertions of a) are therefore established. Hence, if x=(xα)x = (x_\alpha) and y=(yα)y = (y_\alpha) are such that xαx_\alpha and yαy_\alpha belong to the same orbit with respect to GαG_\alpha for each α∈I\alpha \in I, then xx and yy belong to the same orbit with respect to GG, and therefore hh is injective.

Likewise, the hypothesis of b) implies that the inverse system of canonical mappings vα:Xα→Xα/Gαv_\alpha : X_\alpha \to X_\alpha/G_\alpha satisfies the conditions of Chapter I, § 9, no. 6, Proposition 8, Corollary 2, and therefore its inverse limit v=lim←⁡vα:X→lim←⁡Xα/Gαv = \varprojlim v_\alpha : X \to \varprojlim X_\alpha/G_\alpha is surjective, and the inverse image under v of every point of lim←⁡Xα/Gα\varprojlim X_\alpha / G_\alpha is compact. Since v factorizes into

X→ψX/G→hlim←⁡Xα/Gα, X \xrightarrow{\psi} X/G \xrightarrow{h} \varprojlim X_\alpha / G_\alpha,
where ψ\psi is the canonical mapping, the assertions of b) follow.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.