Bourbaki

Theorem 1

Tag 0BVN, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BVN].

General Topology, chapter V, § 3. Topological characterization of the groups R and T

A topological group GG in which there exists a neighbourhood of the identity element homeomorphic to an open interval of R\mathbf{R} is locally isomorphic to R\mathbf{R}.

The significance of this theorem is that it allows us to deduce, from a purely topological property of a group GG, a property of the group structure of GG.

We are concerned here with a phenomenon which is peculiar to the group R\mathbf{R} and has no analogue for the groups Rn\mathbf{R}^n when n>1n > 1 (cf. Chapter VIII, § 1, no. 4). Groups locally isomorphic to R\mathbf{R} are sometimes called one-parameter groups.

To prove Theorem 1 we shall reduce it to Proposition 2 of § 2. By hypothesis, there is a homeomorphism φ\varphi of an open neighbourhood UU of the identity element ee of GG onto an open interval in R\mathbf{R}. By means of the inverse of the mapping φ\varphi we can transport to UU the linear order structure of the interval φ(U)\varphi(U); the topology of UU (induced by that of GG) then has a base consisting of all the open intervals of UU (Chapter

IV, , no. 4, Proposition 5). We can find a symmetric neighbourhood V of e such that V.V ⊂ U and such that V is an open interval; for there exists an open interval V' containing e such that V'.V' ⊂ U ∩ U^{-1}, V'.V'^{-1} ⊂ U and V'^{-1}.V' ⊂ U; taking V = V' ∪ V'^{-1}, V is open and symmetric, satisfies V.V ⊂ U and is connected, hence is an interval (Chapter IV, § 2, no. 5, Theorem 4)

We show that, if x, y, z belong to V, the relation x < y implies xz < yz and zx < zy. Indeed, the functions f_1(z) = φ(yz) − φ(xz) and f_2(z) = φ(zy) − φ(zx) are continuous on V; they are > 0 for z = e and do not vanish in V [e.g., if we had φ(yz) = φ(xz), we should have yz = xz and therefore y = x]. Since f_1(V) and f_2(V) are connected (Chapter I, § 11, no. 2, Proposition 4) and are therefore intervals in R (Chapter IV, § 2, no. 5, Theorem 4), and since these intervals each contain a number > 0 and do not contain 0, they are contained in R^*_+ : that is, we have f_1(z) > 0 and f_2(z) > 0 for all z ∈ V.

If x and y are two elements of V such that x ≥ e and y ≥ e, then in particular we have xy ≥ e. Let E denote the (linearly ordered) set of elements of U which are ≥ e, and let I denote the set of elements of V which are ≥ e; then the axioms (GR_I), (GR_{II}), (GR_{IIIa}) and (GR_{IVa}) of § 2 are satisfied (taking ω to be the element e, and the law of composition to be that of the group G). This is clear for (GR_I), (GR_{II}) and (GR_{IVa}), from what precedes. As to (GR_{IIIa}), it is enough to remark that, if e < x < y (x ∈ V, y ∈ V), we have x^{-1} ∈ V, hence x^{-1} < e < x^{-1}y and x^{-1}y < y; consequently z = x^{-1}y belongs to I and we have xz = y. By Proposition 2 of § 2 there exists therefore a strictly increasing mapping f of I onto an interval of R, with left-hand end-point 0, such that f(e) = 0 and f(xy) = f(x) + f(y) whenever x, y and xy belong to I (which will be the case whenever x and y belong to W ∩ I, W being a neighbourhood of e such that W.W ⊂ V).

For every element x ∈ V which does not belong to I we have x < e, hence x^{-1} > e; consequently we can extend f to a strictly increasing mapping f‾\overline{f} of V onto an interval of R by putting f‾(x)=−f(x−1)\overline{f}(x) = -f(x^{-1}) for all x < e in V. The inverse image under f‾\overline{f} of an open interval contained in f‾(V)\overline{f}(V) is an open interval of V, so that f‾\overline{f} is continuous on V; conversely, the image under f‾\overline{f} of an open interval of V is an open interval of f‾(V)\overline{f}(V), and therefore f‾\overline{f} is a homeomorphism of V onto a neighbourhood of 0 in the group R. On the other hand, it is easily checked (as in Proposition 6 of § 1, no. 4, by considering the various possible cases) that we have f‾(xy)=f‾(x)+f‾(y)\overline{f}(xy) = \overline{f}(x) + \overline{f}(y) whenever x, y and xy all belong to V; and we therefore conclude that f‾\overline{f}, restricted to a suitable neighbourhood of e in G, is a local isomorphism of G with R (Chapter III, § 1, no. 3, Proposition 3).

Q.E.D.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.