*Let R=(Uα)α∈A be an open covering of a metrizable space X. Then there is a sequence (Gn) of locally finite families of open subsets of X, such that S=⋃nSn is an open covering of X which refines R.
Let d be a metric on X compatible with its topology. For each α∈A and each integer n, let Fnα denote the set of all x∈Uα such that d(x,X−Uα)≥2−n. Since X−Uα is closed, we have Uα=⋃nFnα.
Well-order the set A; for each α∈A and each integer n, let Gnα be the set of all x∈Fnα such that x∈/Fn+1,β for all β<α, and let Vnα be the set of all y∈X such that d(y,Gnα)>2−n−3. Vnα is clearly an open set; on the other hand, Vnα⊂Uα, because for each y∈Vnα there exists x∈Gnα such that d(x,y)≤2−n−1, and since x∈Fnα, we have
d(y,X−Uα)≥d(x,X−Uα)−d(x,y)≥2−n−1,
so that y∈Uα. Furthermore, for each x∈X let α be the smallest index in A such that x∈Uα; then there is an integer n such that x∈Fnα, and the definition of α implies that x∈Gnα, so that x∈Vnα. This shows that if we put Sn=(Vnα)α∈A, then S=⋃nSn is an open covering of X which refines R; thus it remains to be shown that each of the families Sn is locally finite. To this end we shall first show that d(Gnα,Gnβ)≥2−n−1 if α=β. Suppose that β<α; then if x∈Gnα and y∈Fnβ we have x∈/Fn+1,β by definition, hence d(x,X−Uβ)<2−n−1 and d(y,X−Uβ)≥2−n, and therefore d(x,y)≥2−n−1; since Gnβ⊂Fnβ, the assertion follows. From this it follows immediately, using the definition of Vnα and Vnβ, that d(Vnα,Vnβ)≥2−n−2. From this last inequality we deduce that, for each z∈X, the open ball with centre z and radius 2−n−3 meets at most one set of the family Sn; hence Sn is a locally finite family, and the proof is complete.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.