Bourbaki

Lemma 3

Tag 0C60, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0C60].

General Topology, chapter IX, § 4. Normal spaces

*Let R=(Uα)α∈A\mathscr{R} = (U_\alpha)_{\alpha \in A} be an open covering of a metrizable space X. Then there is a sequence (Gn)(\mathscr{G}_n) of locally finite families of open subsets of X, such that S=⋃nSn\mathscr{S} = \bigcup_n \mathscr{S}_n is an open covering of X which refines R\mathscr{R}.

Let dd be a metric on X compatible with its topology. For each α∈A\alpha \in A and each integer nn, let FnαF_{n\alpha} denote the set of all x∈Uαx \in U_\alpha such that d(x,X−Uα)≥2−nd(x, X - U_\alpha) \geq 2^{-n}. Since X−UαX - U_\alpha is closed, we have Uα=⋃nFnαU_\alpha = \bigcup_n F_{n\alpha}.

Well-order the set AA; for each α∈A\alpha \in A and each integer nn, let GnαG_{n\alpha} be the set of all x∈Fnαx \in F_{n\alpha} such that x∉Fn+1,βx \notin F_{n+1,\beta} for all β<α\beta < \alpha, and let VnαV_{n\alpha} be the set of all y∈Xy \in X such that d(y,Gnα)>2−n−3d(y, G_{n\alpha}) > 2^{-n-3}. VnαV_{n\alpha} is clearly an open set; on the other hand, Vnα⊂UαV_{n\alpha} \subset U_\alpha, because for each y∈Vnαy \in V_{n\alpha} there exists x∈Gnαx \in G_{n\alpha} such that d(x,y)≤2−n−1d(x, y) \leq 2^{-n-1}, and since x∈Fnαx \in F_{n\alpha}, we have

d(y,X−Uα)≥d(x,X−Uα)−d(x,y)≥2−n−1, d(y, X - U_\alpha) \geq d(x, X - U_\alpha) - d(x, y) \geq 2^{-n-1},

so that y∈Uαy \in U_\alpha. Furthermore, for each x∈Xx \in X let α\alpha be the smallest index in AA such that x∈Uαx \in U_\alpha; then there is an integer nn such that x∈Fnαx \in F_{n\alpha}, and the definition of α\alpha implies that x∈Gnαx \in G_{n\alpha}, so that x∈Vnαx \in V_{n\alpha}. This shows that if we put Sn=(Vnα)α∈A\mathfrak{S}_n = (V_{n\alpha})_{\alpha \in A}, then S=⋃nSn\mathfrak{S} = \bigcup_n \mathfrak{S}_n is an open covering of XX which refines R\mathscr{R}; thus it remains to be shown that each of the families Sn\mathfrak{S}_n is locally finite. To this end we shall first show that d(Gnα,Gnβ)≥2−n−1d(G_{n\alpha}, G_{n\beta}) \geq 2^{-n-1} if α≠β\alpha \neq \beta. Suppose that β<α\beta < \alpha; then if x∈Gnαx \in G_{n\alpha} and y∈Fnβy \in F_{n\beta} we have x∉Fn+1,βx \notin F_{n+1,\beta} by definition, hence d(x,X−Uβ)<2−n−1d(x, X - U_\beta) < 2^{-n-1} and d(y,X−Uβ)≥2−nd(y, X - U_\beta) \geq 2^{-n}, and therefore d(x,y)≥2−n−1d(x, y) \geq 2^{-n-1}; since Gnβ⊂FnβG_{n\beta} \subset F_{n\beta}, the assertion follows. From this it follows immediately, using the definition of VnαV_{n\alpha} and VnβV_{n\beta}, that d(Vnα,Vnβ)≥2−n−2d(V_{n\alpha}, V_{n\beta}) \geq 2^{-n-2}. From this last inequality we deduce that, for each z∈Xz \in X, the open ball with centre zz and radius 2−n−32^{-n-3} meets at most one set of the family Sn\mathfrak{S}_n; hence Sn\mathfrak{S}_n is a locally finite family, and the proof is complete.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.