Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 0CC5, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CC5].

General Topology, chapter X, § 2. Equicontinuous sets

Let T be a set, let S\mathscr{S} be a set of subsets of T, let Y be a uniform space, X a topological (resp. uniform) space, and let f be a mapping of T×XT \times X into YY. For each A∈SA \in \mathscr{S}, let HA⊂F(X;Y)H_A \subset \mathscr{F}(X; Y) be the set of all mappings x→f(t,x)x \to f(t, x) as tt runs through AA. Then the mapping x→f(.,x)x \to f(., x) of XX into FS(T;Y)\mathscr{F}_\mathscr{S}(T; Y) is continuous at a point x0∈Xx_0 \in X (resp. uniformly continuous) if and only if the set HAH_A is equicontinuous at x0x_0 (resp. uniformly equicontinuous) for all A∈SA \in \mathscr{S}.

Consider first the particular case where S={T}\mathscr{S} = \{ T \}, i.e. FS(T;Y)=Fu(T;Y)\mathscr{F}_\mathscr{S}(T; Y) = \mathscr{F}_u(T; Y). For each entourage VV of YY, the condition (f(.,x),f(.,x′))∈W(V)(f(., x), f(., x')) \in W(V) signifies that (f(t,x),f(t,x′))∈V(f(t, x), f(t, x')) \in V for all t∈Tt \in T. To say that x→f(.,x)x \to f(., x) is continuous at x0x_0 (resp. is uniformly continuous) is therefore equivalent to saying that, for each entourage VV of YY, there is a neighbourhood UU of x0x_0 in XX (resp. an entourage MM of XX) such that the relation x∈Ux \in U [resp. (x,x′)∈M(x, x') \in M] implies (f(t,x),f(t,x0))∈V(f(t, x), f(t, x_0)) \in V [resp. (f(t,x),f(t,x′))∈V(f(t, x), f(t, x')) \in V] for all t∈Tt \in T, and the proposition follows from Definitions 1 and 2. In the general case, we have to express that, for each A∈SA \in \mathscr{S}, the mapping x→f(.,x)∣Ax \to f(., x)|A of XX into Fu(A;Y)\mathscr{F}_u(A; Y) is continuous at x0x_0 (resp. uniformly continuous), by virtue of § 1, no. 2; from what has been said, this is equivalent to saying that, for each A∈SA \in \mathscr{S}, HAH_A is equicontinuous at x0x_0 (resp. uniformly equicontinuous).

Proposition 1 allows us to translate Definitions 1 and 2 into forms which are sometimes useful, by applying it to the case where T=HT = H and ff is the mapping (h,x)→h(x)(h, x) \to h(x) of H×XH \times X into YY; since f(.,x)f(., x) is the mapping h→h(x)h \to h(x) of HH into YY, we see that:

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.