Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 004H, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 004H].

Algebra, VIII, p. 62, § 4. Semisimple Modules

a) Let M be an isotypical A-module of type S. The A-linear mapping αM:S⊗D\alpha_M: S\otimes_DHomA(S,M)→M_A(S,M)\rightarrow M characterized by αM(s⊗f)=f(s)\alpha_M(s\otimes f) =f(s) (VIII, p. 59) is bijective.

b) Let V be a left vector space over the field D. The D-linear mapping βV:V→\beta_V: V\rightarrow HomA(S,S⊗DV)_A(S,S\otimes_DV) defined by βV(v)(s)=s⊗v\beta_V(v)(s) =s\otimes v (VIII, p. 59) is bijective.

Denote the left D-vector space HomA(S,M)_A(S,M) by H(M)\mathscr{H}(M). The A-module M is, by assumption, the direct sum of a family of submodules isomorphic to S. The A-module S is monogenous; to prove that the mapping αM\alpha_M is bijective, it therefore suffices to consider the case M = S (VIII, p. 60, Remark 3). Now, H(S)\mathscr{H}(S) is simply the D-vector space DsD_s, and αS\alpha_S is simply the isomorphism ι:S⊗DDs→S\iota : S\otimes_DD_s\rightarrow S defined by ι(s⊗d)=sd\iota (s\otimes d) =sd.

Likewise, to prove b), it suffices to consider the case V=DsV = D_s. Since the mapping αS\alpha_S is bijective, the mapping βDs=βH(S)\beta_{D_s}=\beta_{\mathscr{H}(S)} is too (VIII, p. 60, Remark 2).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.