Proposition 11
Tag 0055, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0055].
Algebra, VIII, p. 72, § 4. Semisimple Modules
Let M be a semisimple A-module that is the direct sum of a family of simple submodules. For every , we denote by the set of indices such that is of class . The cardinal of is equal to the dimension of the left -vector space Hom.
The isotypical component of A of type is isomorphic to (VIII, p. 65, Proposition 4, b)). The -vector space Hom may be identified with Hom, so is isomorphic to (No. 2). This proves the proposition.
Every simple module is primordial (VIII, p. 45), so every semisimple module is semiprimordial. Let M be a semisimple A-module, and let . The multiplicity of in M is the primordial multiplicity of in M defined in VIII, p. 34. Proposition 11 translates to the equality
(11) dim(Hom).
More generally, if is a description of M, then is equal to dim. By Proposition 6 of VIII, p. 68, we also have
(12) dim(Hom)
when the multiplicity is finite. Semisimple A-modules M and are isomorphic if and only if we have for every .
Let M be a semisimple A-module. There exists a cardinal that has the following property: for every decomposition of M into a direct sum of simple modules, the cardinal of I is equal to (VIII, p. 34, Corollary 2). This cardinal is called the length of the semisimple A-module M and denoted by long or long(M). When M has finite length, this definition is compatible with that of II, §1, No. 10, p. 212, by Proposition 10.
The simple A-modules are the semisimple A-modules of length 1, and we have the formula
(13) long long
for every family of semisimple A-modules. By Proposition 11, we have
(14) long dim Hom.
By applying this formula to , we obtain long for every .
When A is a field, the simple A-modules are the vector spaces of dimension 1; every A-module is then semisimple (II, §7, No. 1, p. 292, Theorem 1), and its length is simply its dimension as a vector space over A (II, §7, No. 2, p. 293) .
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
- II, §1, No. 10, p. 212
- II, §7, No. 2, p. 293
- II, §7, No. 1, p. 292, Theorem 1 not in this corpus
- VIII, p. 34
- VIII, p. 34, Corollary 2
- VIII, p. 45
- Proposition 10
- VIII, p. 65, Proposition 4
- Proposition 6 of VIII, p. 68