Bourbaki

Proposition 11

Tag 0055, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0055].

Algebra, VIII, p. 72, § 4. Semisimple Modules

Let M be a semisimple A-module that is the direct sum of a family (Mi)i∈I(M_i)_{i\in I} of simple submodules. For every λ∈S\lambda \in \mathscr{S}, we denote by I(λ)I(\lambda ) the set of indices i∈Ii\in I such that MiM_i is of class λ\lambda. The cardinal of I(λ)I(\lambda ) is equal to the dimension of the left DλD_{\lambda}-vector space HomA(Sλ,M)_A(S_{\lambda},M).

The isotypical component of A of type λ\lambda is isomorphic to Sλ(I(λ))S_{\lambda}^{(I(\lambda))} (VIII, p. 65, Proposition 4, b)). The DλD_{\lambda}-vector space HomA(Sλ,M)_A(S_{\lambda},M) may be identified with HomA(Sλ,Mλ)_A(S_{\lambda},M_{\lambda}), so is isomorphic to Dλ(I(λ))D_{\lambda}^{(I(\lambda))} (No. 2). This proves the proposition.

Every simple module is primordial (VIII, p. 45), so every semisimple module is semiprimordial. Let M be a semisimple A-module, and let λ∈S\lambda \in \mathscr{S}. The multiplicity of λ\lambda in M is the primordial multiplicity [M:λ][M :\lambda ] of λ\lambda in M defined in VIII, p. 34. Proposition 11 translates to the equality

(11) [M:λ]=[M :\lambda ] = dimDλ_{D_{\lambda}}(HomA(Sλ,M)_A(S_{\lambda},M)).

More generally, if ((Vλ)λ∈S,α)((V_{\lambda})_{\lambda\in\mathscr{S}}, \alpha ) is a description of M, then [M:λ][M :\lambda ] is equal to dimDλ(Vλ)_{D_{\lambda}}(V_{\lambda}). By Proposition 6 of VIII, p. 68, we also have

(12) [M:λ]=[M :\lambda ] = dimDλ_{D_{\lambda}}(HomA(M,Sλ)_A(M,S_{\lambda}))

when the multiplicity [M:λ][M :\lambda ] is finite. Semisimple A-modules M and M′M' are isomorphic if and only if we have [M:λ]=[M′:λ][M :\lambda ] = [M':\lambda ] for every λ∈S\lambda \in \mathscr{S}.

Let M be a semisimple A-module. There exists a cardinal I\mathbf{I} that has the following property: for every decomposition M=⨁i∈IMiM =\bigoplus_{i\in I}M_i of M into a direct sum of simple modules, the cardinal of I is equal to I\mathbf{I} (VIII, p. 34, Corollary 2). This cardinal is called the length of the semisimple A-module M and denoted by longA(M)_A(M) or long(M). When M has finite length, this definition is compatible with that of II, §1, No. 10, p. 212, by Proposition 10.

The simple A-modules are the semisimple A-modules of length 1, and we have the formula

(13) longA(⨁j∈JMj)=∑j∈J_A(\bigoplus_{j\in J}M_j)=\sum_{j\in J} longA(Mj)_A(M_j)

for every family (Mj)j∈J(M_j)_{j\in J} of semisimple A-modules. By Proposition 11, we have

(14) longA(M)=∑λ∈S_A(M) =\sum_{\lambda\in\mathscr{S}} dimDλ_{D_{\lambda}} HomA(Sλ,M)_A(S_{\lambda},M).

By applying this formula to MλM_{\lambda}, we obtain [M:λ]=[M :\lambda ] = longA(Mλ)_A(M_{\lambda}) for every λ∈S\lambda \in \mathscr{S}.

When A is a field, the simple A-modules are the vector spaces of dimension 1; every A-module is then semisimple (II, §7, No. 1, p. 292, Theorem 1), and its length is simply its dimension as a vector space over A (II, §7, No. 2, p. 293) .

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.