Proposition 4
Tag 009A, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 009A].
Algebra, VIII, p. 138, § 8. Semisimple Rings
Let A be a ring. The following properties are equivalent:
(i) The ring A is semisimple.
(ii) Every A-module is semisimple.
(iii) There exists a generating and semisimple A-module.
(iv) There exists a faithful and semisimple A-module with finitely generated countermodule.
(v) Every A-module is projective.
(vi) Every monogenous A-module is projective.
For other characterizations of semisimple rings, see Proposition 6 of X, §8, n, p.
Let us first prove that (i) implies (ii) and (v). Suppose that the ring A is semisimple, and consider a left A-module M. By assumption, the A-module is semisimple, so every free A-module is semisimple. By Proposition 20 of II, §1, No. 11, p. 218, there exist a free A-module L and a surjective A-linear mapping from L to M. Let N be the kernel of . Since the A-module L is semisimple, there exists a semisimple submodule supplementary to N in L (VIII, p. 56, Theorem 1). The A-module is projective, and induces an isomorphism from to M. Consequently, M is semisimple and projective.
(ii) (iii): If every A-module is semisimple, then the A-module is semisimple; it is moreover generating.
(iii) (iv): If M is a generating A-module, then it is faithful (VIII, p. 80, Corollary of Theorem 1), and its countermodule is finitely generated (VIII, p. 99, Corollary 1).
(iv) (i): Let M be a faithful and semisimple A-module with finitely generated countermodule. By Lemma 4 of VIII, p. 8, there exists a natural number such that is isomorphic to a submodule of . The A-module is semisimple, and therefore so is .
The implication (v) (vi) is immediate.
(vi) (i): Suppose that every monogenous A-module is projective. Let be a left ideal of A. Since the A-module is projective, there exists a left ideal of A such that is the direct sum of and (II, §2, No. 2, p. 231, Proposition 4). Consequently, the ring A is semisimple (VIII, p. 135, Theorem 1).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
- Proposition 2, § 10
- Remark, § 11
- Theorem 2, § 13
- § 20. Linear Representations of Algebras
- Proposition 6, § 8
- Proposition 7, § 8
- Remark 4, § 9
Cites
- Proposition 6 of X, §8, n$^o4$, p. $140 not in this corpus: A X
- Proposition 20 of II, §1, No. 11, p. 218 not in this corpus
- II, §2, No. 2, p. 231, Proposition 4 not in this corpus
- Lemma 4 of VIII, p. 8
- VIII, p. 56, Theorem 1
- VIII, p. 80, Corollary of Theorem 1
- VIII, p. 99, Corollary 1
- VIII, p. 135, Theorem 1