Proposition 3
Tag 00H2, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00H2].
Algebra, VIII, p. 262, § 14. Central Simple Algebras
Let A be a central simple K-algebra of finite degree, and let L be a semisimple commutative subalgebra of A. The following properties are equivalent:
(i) The algebra L is a maximal commutative subalgebra of A.
(ii) The left L-module A is free, of dimension [L : K].
(iii) We have .
Suppose, moreover, that A is the algebra End, where V is a vector space of nonzero finite dimension over K. Then the previous properties are also equivalent to the following:
(iv) V is a free L-module of dimension 1.
A) Suppose that A is of the form End(V), where V is a vector space of nonzero finite dimension over the field K. We will establish the equivalence of conditions (i) through (iv) following the diagram
(i) (iv) (ii) (iii) (i) .
Since L is a semisimple commutative algebra of finite degree over K, we can identify it with a finite product of extensions of K of finite degree (VIII, p. 137, Proposition 3). For every , let be the isotypical component of type of the L-module V; it is a vector space of nonzero finite dimension over because V is a faithful L-module (VIII, p. 144, Corollary). We can then identify V with . Under these conditions, the commutant of L in A, which is simply the algebra End(V), can be identified with the product End.
Suppose that L is a maximal commutative subalgebra of End. By Lemma 3, a), we have , so is commutative and we have dim for every . So (i) implies (iv).
Suppose that the L-module V is free of dimension 1. Let be a basis of V over K. The mapping is an isomorphism of left A-modules and therefore of L-modules from A to . Consequently, A is a free left L-module of dimension , and we have dim. So (iv) implies (ii).
It is clear that (i) implies (iii).
Finally, suppose that we have , in other words, dim. We then have dim, so that has dimension 1 over for every . We then have End for every , and so . By Lemma 3, a), L is a maximal commutative subalgebra of A. So (iii) implies (i).
B) Let us continue with the general case. By Theorem 1 of VIII, p. 252, there exists a separable extension of K of finite degree such that the -algebra is isomorphic to an algebra End, where is a vector space of nonzero finite dimension over . Then the -algebra is commutative and semisimple (VIII, p. 222, Corollary 2). By the first part of the proof, the following properties are equivalent:
(i) The algebra is a maximal commutative subalgebra of .
(ii) The left -module is free, of dimension .
(iii) We have .
By Lemma 3, b), properties (i) and (i’) are equivalent.
Set ; then . Property (ii) means that the left L-modules A and are isomorphic; by Theorem 3 of VIII, p. 37, this is equivalent to the -modules and being isomorphic. The equivalence of (ii) and (ii) follows.
Finally, we have and , which give the equivalence of properties (iii) and (iii). We have thus proved the equivalence of properties (i), (ii), and (iii).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
- Corollary, § 14
- Corollary 2, § 14
- Proposition 5, § 14
- Corollary 1, § 15
- Corollary 2, § 15
- Proposition 5, § 15
- Theorem 4, § 16
- Proposition 7, § 17
- Proposition 9, § 17
- Corollary 1, § 19