Proposition 5
Tag 00I3, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00I3].
Algebra, VIII, p. 281, § 15. Brauer Groups
Let A be a central simple K-algebra of finite degree, and let L be an extension of K of finite degree. The following properties are equivalent:
(i) The extension L is a splitting field for A.
(ii) There exists a central simple K-algebra of finite degree similar to A containing a maximal commutative subalgebra isomorphic to L.
Let us prove that (ii) implies (i); it suffices to consider the case when L is a maximal commutative subalgebra of A. Let End be the canonical isomorphism that sends to the K-linear mapping (VIII, p. 252, Theorem 1). We view A as a right vector space over L; then sends into the subspace End of End and induces, by restriction, an injective homomorphism of L-algebras End. Set . By VIII, p. 262, Proposition 3, we have , and therefore and [End. Consequently, is an isomorphism, which proves (i).
The converse follows from Lemma 3 below.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.