Bourbaki

Theorem 5

Tag 00JM, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00JM].

Algebra, VIII, p. 320, § 16. Other Descriptions of the Brauer Group

There exists a group isomorphism

Ψ : Exτ(G,L∗)⟶_{\tau}(G,L^*)\longrightarrow Br(L/K/K)

that sends the class of a τ\tau-extension E\mathscr{E} of G by L∗L^* to the class in Br(L/K/K) of the algebra A[E;L]\mathbf{A}[\mathscr{E}; L].

To define Ψ and verify that it is a bijection, we must establish the following points:

a) If E\mathscr{E} and E′\mathscr{E}' are isomorphic τ\tau-extensions of G by L∗L^*, then the algebras A[E;L]\mathbf{A}[\mathscr{E}; L] and A[E′;L]\mathbf{A}[\mathscr{E}'; L] are isomorphic.

b) Conversely, if the algebras A[E;L]\mathbf{A}[\mathscr{E}; L] and A[E′;L]\mathbf{A}[\mathscr{E}'; L] are isomorphic, then the τ\tau-extensions E\mathscr{E} and E′\mathscr{E}' of G by L∗L^* are isomorphic.

c) In every class in Br(L/K/K), there is an algebra E containing L as a maximal commutative subalgebra.

d) If E is a central simple algebra of finite degree over K containing L as a maximal commutative subalgebra, then there exists a τ\tau-extension E\mathscr{E} of G by L∗L^* such that E is isomorphic to A[E;L]\mathbf{A}[\mathscr{E}; L].

Assertion a) follows from the construction of the cross product; b) follows from VIII, p. 263, Corollary. Assertion c) follows from Proposition 5 of VIII, p. 281, and d) is simply Theorem 4 above.

It remains to verify that Ψ is a group homomorphism; for this, it suffices to prove that if E1=(Γ1,ι1,π1)\mathscr{E}_1= (\Gamma_1, \iota_1, \pi_1) and E2=(Γ2,ι2,π2)\mathscr{E}_2= (\Gamma_2, \iota_2, \pi_2) are τ\tau-extensions, then the algebra A[E1E2;L]\mathbf{A}[\mathscr{E}_1\mathscr{E}_2; L] is equivalent to the algebra A[E1;L]⊗A[E2;L]\mathbf{A}[\mathscr{E}_1; L]\otimes \mathbf{A}[\mathscr{E}_2; L]. We denote the product extension E1E2\mathscr{E}_1\mathscr{E}_2 by E=(Γ,ι,π)\mathscr{E}= (\Gamma , \iota , \pi ). The group Γ is isomorphic to the cokernel of the homomorphism ρ\rho from L∗L^* to the fiber product Γ1×GΓ2\Gamma_1\times_G\Gamma_2 that sends μ\mu to (ι1(μ),ι2(μ)−1)(\iota_1(\mu), \iota_2(\mu)^{-1}). For i∈{1,2}i\in \{1,2\}, write Ai=A[Ei;L]A_i=\mathbf{A}[\mathscr{E}_i; L]. Let ui:L→Aiu_i: L\rightarrow A_i and vi:Γi→Ai∗v_i: \Gamma_i\rightarrow A^*_i be the canonical homomorphisms. We identify L with its images by the homomorphisms uiu_i, which make L into maximal commutative subalgebras of the AiA_i. We denote by ViV_i the L-vector space defined by left multiplication in AiA_i. The ring L⊗KAioL\otimes_KA^o_i acts on ViV_i. Since it is simple and has dimension n2n^2 over L, we obtain an isomorphism from L⊗KAioL\otimes_KA^o_i to EndL(Vi)_L(V_i). Hence the ring L⊗KA1o⊗KA2oL\otimes_KA^o_1\otimes_KA^o_2, which we can identify with (L⊗KA1o)⊗L(L⊗KA2o)(L\otimes_KA^o_1)\otimes_L(L\otimes_KA^o_2), is isomorphic to EndL(V1⊗LV2)_L(V_1\otimes_LV_2). Set C = EndA1o⊗KA2o(V1⊗LV2)_{A^o_1\otimes_KA^o_2}(V_1\otimes_LV_2). By Lemma 3 of VIII, p. 282, the ring C is similar to A1⊗KA2A_1\otimes_KA_2, and L⊗1⊗1L\otimes 1\otimes 1 is a maximal commutative subalgebra of C. For every pair (γ1,γ2)∈Γ1×Γ2(\gamma_1, \gamma_2)\in \Gamma_1\times \Gamma_2 satisfying π1(γ1)=π2(γ2)\pi_1(\gamma_1) =\pi_2(\gamma_2), we denote by w(γ1,γ2)w(\gamma_1, \gamma_2) the unique λ(π1(γ1\lambda (\pi_1(\gamma_1))-semilinear (II, §1, No. 13, p. 223) endomorphism such that

w(γ1,γ2)(x1⊗x2)=v1(γ1)x1⊗v2(γ2)x2 w(\gamma_1, \gamma_2)(x_1\otimes x_2) =v_1(\gamma_1)x_1\otimes v_2(\gamma_2)x_2

for x1∈V1x_1\in V_1 and x2∈V2x_2\in V_2. We have w(γ1,γ2)∈C∗w(\gamma_1, \gamma_2)\in C^*, and ww is a group homomorphism from the fiber product Γ1×GΓ2\Gamma_1\times_G\Gamma_2 to C∗C^*. This homomorphism is trivial on the image of ρ\rho and induces a homomorphism vv from Γ to C∗C^*. Denote by u:L→Cu: L\rightarrow C the morphism given by u:ℓ↦ℓ⊗1⊗1u:\ell \mapsto \ell \otimes 1\otimes 1. We can verify the relations

u(α)=v(ι(α))u(\alpha ) =v(\iota (\alpha )) and u(γβ)=v(γ)u(β)v(γ)−1u(^{\gamma}\beta ) =v(\gamma )u(\beta )v(\gamma )^{-1}

for α∈L∗,β∈L\alpha \in L^*,\beta \in L, and γ∈Γ\gamma \in \Gamma. Proposition 12 of VIII, p. 315 gives a homomorphism ff from the algebra A[E;L]\mathbf{A}[\mathscr{E}; L] to C. Since the algebra A[E;L]\mathbf{A}[\mathscr{E}; L] is simple, the homomorphism ff is injective. The algebras C and A[E;L]\mathbf{A}[\mathscr{E}; L] have the same dimension over K, so ff is an isomorphism.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.