Bourbaki

Theorem 1 (Jacobson)

Tag 00S5, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00S5].

Algebra, VIII, p. 156, § 9. Radical

The radical of a ring A consists of the elements x∈Ax\in A such that 1+ax1 +ax is left invertible (I, §2, No. 3, p. 15) for every a∈Aa\in A. It is also the largest two-sided ideal a\mathfrak{a} such that 1+x1 +x is invertible for every x∈ax\in \mathfrak{a}. The radical of A contains every left nil ideal of A.

The element 1 generates the A-module AsA_s, and 1+ax1 +ax is left invertible if and only if it generates the A-module AsA_s. The first assertion of Theorem 1 is therefore a specific case of the corollary of Proposition 2 (VIII, p. 153).

Let x∈R(A)x\in \mathfrak{R}(A). By the above, 1+x1 +x is left invertible; let yy be an element of A such that y(1+x)=1y(1 +x) = 1. We then have 1−y=yx1-y=yx, so 1−y1-y belongs to R(A)\mathfrak{R}(A); consequently, yy is left invertible. Since yy is also right invertible, it is invertible (I, §2, No. 3, p. 16, Proposition 3), and so is its right inverse 1+x1 +x.

Let a\mathfrak{a} be a left ideal of A such that 1+x1 +x is invertible for every x∈ax\in \mathfrak{a}. This holds, for example, when a\mathfrak{a} is a nil ideal because the relation xn=0x^n= 0 implies that 1−x+⋯+(−x)n−11-x+\cdots + (-x)^{n-1} is the inverse of 1+x1 +x. Let x∈ax\in \mathfrak{a}. For every a∈Aa\in A, we have ax∈aax\in \mathfrak{a}, so 1+ax1 +ax is invertible; hence, we have x∈R(A)x\in \mathfrak{R}(A). It follows that a\mathfrak{a} is contained in R(A)\mathfrak{R}(A).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.