Bourbaki

Exercise 13, § 6

Tag 03NT, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03NT].

Theory of Sets, III, 243

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

(a) Let w(ξ)w(\xi) be an ordinal functional symbol (§2, Exercise 17), defined for ξ⩾α0\xi \geqslant \alpha_0 and such that the relation α0⩽ξ<ξ′\alpha_0 \leqslant \xi < \xi' implies w(ξ)<w(ξ′)w(\xi) < w(\xi'). Show that, if ξ⩾α0\xi \geqslant \alpha_0, then w(ξ+η)⩾w(ξ)+ηw(\xi + \eta) \geqslant w(\xi) + \eta for every ordinal η\eta (argue by contradiction). Deduce that there exists α\alpha such that w(ξ)⩾ξw(\xi) \geqslant \xi for all ξ⩾α\xi \geqslant \alpha (take α\alpha to be the least indecomposable ordinal ⩾α0\geqslant \alpha_0; cf. Exercise 11 (a)).

(b) Let f(ξ,η)f(\xi, \eta) be the ordinal functional symbol defined in §2, Exercise 17 (b). Suppose that the relations α0⩽ξ⩽ξ′\alpha_0 \leqslant \xi \leqslant \xi' and α0⩽η⩽η′\alpha_0 \leqslant \eta \leqslant \eta' imply g(ξ,η)⩽g(ξ′,η′)g(\xi, \eta) \leqslant g(\xi', \eta'), so that the relations α0⩽ξ⩽ξ′\alpha_0 \leqslant \xi \leqslant \xi' and 1⩽η⩽η′1 \leqslant \eta \leqslant \eta' imply f(ξ,η)⩽f(ξ′,η′)f(\xi, \eta) \leqslant f(\xi', \eta') (§ 2, Exercise 17 (d)). Show that for each ordinal β\beta there exists at most a finite number of ordinals η\eta for which the equation f(ξ,η)=βf(\xi, \eta) = \beta has at least one solution. (Note that if ξ1\xi_1 is the least solution of f(ξ,η1)=βf(\xi, \eta_1) = \beta and if ξ2\xi_2 is the least solution of f(ξ,η2)=βf(\xi, \eta_2) = \beta, then the relation η1<η2\eta_1 < \eta_2 implies ξ1>ξ2\xi_1 > \xi_2.)

(c) A critical ordinal with respect to ff is any infinite ordinal γ>α0\gamma > \alpha_0 such that f(ξ,γ)=γf(\xi, \gamma) = \gamma for all ξ\xi such that α0⩽ξ<γ\alpha_0 \leqslant \xi < \gamma. Show that a critical ordinal (with respect to ff) has no predecessor. If there exists a set A of ordinals such that f(ξ,γ)=γf(\xi, \gamma) = \gamma for all ξ∈A\xi \in A, and if γ\gamma is the least upper bound of A, show that γ\gamma is a critical ordinal.

(d) Let h(ξ)=f(ξ,ξ)h(\xi) = f(\xi, \xi) (defined for ξ⩾α0\xi \geqslant \alpha_0). Define inductively α1=α0+2\alpha_1 = \alpha_0 + 2, αn+1=h(αn)\alpha_{n+1} = h(\alpha_n) for n⩾1n \geqslant 1. Show that the least upper bound of the sequence (αn)(\alpha_n) is a critical ordinal with respect to ff.

(e) Show that the least upper bound of every set of critical ordinals with respect to ff is again a critical ordinal, and that every critical ordinal is indecomposable (note that f(ξ,η+1)⩾ω(ξ)+η⩾ξ+ηf(\xi, \eta + 1) \geqslant \omega(\xi) + \eta \geqslant \xi + \eta for all ξ⩾α0\xi \geqslant \alpha_0).

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.