Bourbaki

Definition 3

Tag 04DJ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04DJ].

Commutative Algebra, chapter III, § 2. General results on filtered rings and modules

Let AA be a filtered ring, (An)n∈Z(A_n)_{n \in \mathbf{Z}} its filtration and EE an AA-module. A filtration (En)n∈Z(E_n)_{n \in \mathbf{Z}} on EE is called compatible with its module structure over the filtered ring AA if

AmEn⊂Em+nform∈Z,n∈Z. A_m E_n \subset E_{m+n} \quad \text{for} \quad m \in \mathbf{Z}, \quad n \in \mathbf{Z}.
The AA-module EE with this filtration is called a filtered module.

The EnE_n are all AnA_n-modules; if B=⋃n∈ZAnB = \bigcup_{n \in \mathbf{Z}} A_n, clearly ⋃n∈ZEn\bigcup_{n \in \mathbf{Z}} E_n is a BB-module and so is ⋂n∈ZEn\bigcap_{n \in \mathbf{Z}} E_n by the same argument as above for ⋂n∈ZAn\bigcap_{n \in \mathbf{Z}} A_n. If An=AA_n = A, all the EnE_n are submodules of EE.

Examples

(1) Let AA be a graded ring of type Z\mathbf{Z}; for all i∈Zi \in \mathbf{Z}, let A(i)A_{(i)} be the subgroup of homogeneous elements of degree ii in AA. Let us write An=∑i≥nA(i)A_n = \sum_{i \geq n} A_{(i)}; then it is immediate that (An)(A_n) is an exhaustive and separated decreasing filtration which is compatible with the ring structure on AA; this filtration is said to be associated with the graduation (A(i))i∈Z(A_{(i)})_{i \in \mathbf{Z}} and the filtered ring AA is said to be associated with the given graded ring AA.

Now let EE be a graded module of type Z\mathbf{Z} over the graded ring AA and for all i∈Zi \in \mathbf{Z} let E(i)E_{(i)} be the subgroup of homogeneous elements of degree ii of EE. Let us write En=∑i≥nE(i)E_n = \sum_{i \geq n} E_{(i)}; then (En)(E_n) is an exhaustive and separated decreasing filtration which is compatible with the module structure on EE over the filtered ring AA; this filtration is said to be associated with the graduation (E(i))i∈Z(E_{(i)})_{i \in \mathbf{Z}} and the filtered module EE is said to be associated with the given graded module EE.

(2) Let AA be a filtered ring, (An)n∈Z(A_n)_{n \in \mathbf{Z}} its filtration and EE an AA-module. Let us write En=AnEE_n = A_n E; it follows from (1) that

AmEn=AmAnE⊂Am+nE=Em+n, A_m E_n = A_m A_n E \subset A_{m+n} E = E_{m+n},
and from (2) that E0=EE_0 = E; then (En)(E_n) is an exhaustive filtration which is compatible with the AA-module structure on EE. This filtration is said to be derived from the given filtration (An)(A_n) on AA; note that it is not necessarily separated, even if (An)(A_n) is separated and EE and the AnA_n are finitely generated AA-modules (cf. , Exercise 2; see however § 3, no. 3, Proposition 5 and no. 2, Corollary to Proposition 4)

(3) Let AA be a ring and mm a two-sided ideal of AA. Let us write An=mnA_n = m^n for n≥0n \geq 0, An=AA_n = A for n<0n < 0; it is immediate that (An)(A_n) is an exhaustive filtration on AA, called the mm-adic filtration. Let EE be an AA-module; the filtration (En)(E_n) derived from the mm-adic filtration on AA is called the mm-adic filtration on EE; in other words, En=mnEE_n = m^n E for n≥0n \geq 0 and En=EE_n = E for n<0n < 0.

If AA is commutative and BB is an AA-algebra, n=mBn = mB is a two-sided ideal of BB and, for every BB-module FF, nkF=mkFn^k F = m^k F and hence the nn-adic filtration on FF coincides with the mm-adic filtration (if FF is considered as an AA-module).

(4) If AA is a filtered ring and (An)(A_n) its filtration, the left AA-module AnA_n is a filtered AA-module with the filtration (An)(A_n). On the other hand, clearly (An)(A_n) is a filtration which is compatible with the ring structure on the opposite ring A0A^0 and AnA_n is a filtered (left) A0A^0-module with the filtration (An)(A_n).

(5) On a ring AA the sets AnA_n such that An=0A_n = 0 for n>0n > 0, An=AA_n = A for n≤0n \leq 0 form what is called a trivial filtration associated (Example 1) with the trivial graduation on AA; on an AA-module EE, every filtration (En)(E_n) consisting of sub-AA-modules is then compatible with the module structure on EE over the filtered ring AA. Then it is possible to say that every filtered commutative group GG is a filtered Z\mathbf{Z}-module, if Z\mathbf{Z} is given the trivial filtration.

Let GG be a filtered group and (Gn)n∈Z(G_n)_{n \in \mathbf{Z}} its filtration; clearly, for every subgroup HH of GG, (H∩Gn)n∈Z(H \cap G_n)_{n \in \mathbf{Z}} is a filtration said to be induced by that on GG; it is exhaustive (resp. separated) if that on GG is. Similarly, if HH is a normal subgroup of GG, the family ((H.Gn)/H)n∈Z((H.G_n)/H)_{n \in \mathbf{Z}} is a filtration on the group G/HG/H, called the quotient under HH of the filtration on GG; it is exhaustive if (Gn)(G_n) is. If G′G' is another filtered group and (Gn′)n∈Z(G'_n)_{n \in \mathbf{Z}} its filtration, (Gn×Gn′)(G_n \times G'_n) is a filtration on G×G′G \times G' called the product of the filtrations on GG and G′G', which is exhaustive (resp. separated) if (Gn)(G_n) and (Gn′)(G'_n) are.

Now let AA be a filtered ring and (An)(A_n) its filtration; on every subring BB of AA, clearly the filtration induced by that on AA is compatible with the ring structure on BB. If bb is a two-sided ideal of AA, the quotient filtration on A/bA/b of that on AA is compatible with the structure of this ring, for

(An+b)(Am+b)⊂An+m+b. (A_n + b)(A_m + b) \subset A_{n+m} + b.
If A′A' is another filtered ring, the product filtration on A×A′A \times A' is compatible with the structure of this ring.

Finally let EE be a filtered AA-module and (En)(E_n) its filtration; on every submodule FF of EE, the filtration induced by that on EE is compatible with the AA-module structure on FF and, on the quotient module E/FE/F, the quotient filtration of that on EE is compatible with the AA-module structure, as

An(F+Em)⊂F+AnEm⊂F+Em+n. A_n(F + E_m) \subset F + A_n E_m \subset F + E_{m+n}.

Note that if the filtration on E is derived from that on A (Example 2), so is the quotient filtration on E/F, but not in general the filtration induced on F (Exercise 1; see however , no. 2, Theorem 2)

If E' is another filtered A-module, the product filtration on E × E' is compatible with its A-module structure. If the filtrations on E and E' are derived from that on A (Example 2), so is their product filtration.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.