Lemma 2
Tag 04ES, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04ES].
Commutative Algebra, chapter III, § 2. General results on filtered rings and modules
Let be an exact sequence of strict morphisms of topological groups (Algebra, Chapter II, § 1, no. 4, Remark). Suppose that admit Hausdorff completion groups and that the identity elements admit countable fundamental systems of neighbourhoods. Then is an exact sequence of strict morphisms.
Let be the respective kernels off and ; let us write
where is the canonical mapping , is an isomorphism of onto , and is the canonical injection . We already know that is an isomorphism of onto and we have just recalled that is an injective strict morphism of , to ; if we show that is a surjective strict morphism, it will follow that is a strict morphism (General Topology, Chapter III, § 2, no. 8, Remark 2). Let be the canonical mapping ; if we show that is a surjective strict morphism of the kernel , we shall see as above that is a strict morphism and the sequence will be exact. Thus we have reduced the problem to proving that, if (where is a normal subgroup of ) and is the canonical mapping, is a surjective strict morphism with kernel .
Let be the mapping which coincides with on ; as (resp. ) is a surjective strict morphism of onto , (resp. onto ), is a surjective strict morphism (General Topology, Chapter III, § 2, no. 8, Remark 3). Now and are metrizable (General Topology, Chapter IX, § 3, no. 1, Proposition 1); then it follows from General Topology, Chapter IX, § 3, no. 1, Corollary 1 to Proposition 4 and Lemma 1, that is a surjective strict morphism and has kernel the closure in of the kernel of . Then it will be sufficient for us to prove that . Now obviously contains ; it will be sufficient to show that is contained in the closure of in . Now,
is an open set in which does not meet ; as is a surjective strict morphism, is an open set in not containing the identity element of and hence not meeting the closure of ; then does not contain the identity element of . But and hence , which complete the proof of Lemma 2.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.