Bourbaki

Proposition 8

Tag 04GP, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04GP].

Commutative Algebra, chapter III, § 3. m-adic topologies on Noetherian rings

Let AA be a commutative Noetherian ring, mm an ideal of AA, A^\hat{A} the Hausdorff completion of AA with respect to the mm-adic topology and jj the canonical mapping from AA to A^\hat{A}. The: (i) A^\hat{A} is a Zariski ring and m^=A^.j(m)\hat{m} = \hat{A}.j(m) is a defining ideal of A^\hat{A}.

(ii) The mapping n↦A=A^.j(n)n \mapsto A = \hat{A}.j(n) is a bijection of the set of maximal ideals of AA containing mm onto the set of maximal ideals of A^\hat{A} and q↦j−1(q)q \mapsto j^{-1}(q) is the inverse bijection.

(iii) Let nn be a maximal ideal of AA containing mm. The homomorphism j′:An→A^n^j': A_n \to \hat{A}_{\hat{n}} derived from jj is injection; if AA, is identified by means of jj with a subring of A^\hat{A}, the (nAn)(nA_n)*-adic topology on* AnA_n is induced by the AA*-adic topology on* A^n^\hat{A}_{\hat{n}} and AnA_n is dense in AA, with the AA*-adic topology*.

Let us show (i). As mm is a finitely generated ideal, (mn)∧=(m^)n=mnA^(m^n)^{\wedge} = (\hat{m})^n = m^n \hat{A} (§ 2, no. 12, Corollary 2 to Proposition 16) and the topology on A^\hat{A} is the mm-adic topology. As A^/m^\hat{A}/\hat{m} is isomorphic to A/mA/m, it is a Noetherian ring and m^=mA^\hat{m} = m \hat{A} is a finitely generated AA-module and therefore A^\hat{A} is Noetherian (§ 2, no. 10, Corollary 5 to Theorem 2); finally, as A^\hat{A} is Hausdorff and complete with respect to the mm-adic topology, A^\hat{A} is a Zariski ring (no. 3, Example 1).

Assertion (ii) follows immediately from the fact that the canonical homomorphism A/m+A^/m^A/m + \hat{A}/\hat{m} derived from jj is bijective and the fact that every maximal ideal of A^\hat{A} contains m^\hat{m}, since A^\hat{A} is a Zariski ring and the Jacobson radical of A^\hat{A} then contains mm (no. 3, Proposition 6).

Finally let us prove (iii). As n=j−1(A)n = j^{-1}(A), j(A−n)⊂A^−n^j(A - n) \subset \hat{A} - \hat{n} and jj certainly defines a homomorphism j′:An→A^n^j': A_n \to \hat{A}_{\hat{n}} (Chapter II, § 2, no. 1, Proposition 2). Let us show that j′j' is injective; let a∈A,s∈A−na \in A, s \in A - n be such that

j′(a/s)=j(a)/j(s)=0; j'(a/s) = j(a)/j(s) = 0;
then there exists s′∈A^−n^s' \in \hat{A} - \hat{n} such that s′j(a)=0s'j(a) = 0 (Chapter II, § 2, no. 1, Remark 3) and the annihilator of j(a)j(a) in A^\hat{A} is therefore not contained in n^\hat{n}. Now, if bb is the annihilator of aa in AA, the annihilator of j(a)j(a) in A^\hat{A} is bb (Corollary 1 to Theorem 3); hence b∉nb \notin n, which shows that a/s=0a/s = 0.

Moreover, there is a commutative diagram

A/nk⟶An/(nAn)kh↓h′↓A^/n^k⟶A^n^/(n^A^n^)k \begin{array}{ccc} A/n^k & \longrightarrow & A_n/(nA_n)^k \\ h \downarrow & & h' \downarrow \\ \hat{A}/\hat{n}^k & \longrightarrow & \hat{A}_{\hat{n}}/(\hat{n}\hat{A}_{\hat{n}})^k \end{array}
where hh and h′h' are derived from jj and j′j' respectively and the horizontal arrows are the canonical isomorphisms of Chapter II, § 3, no. 3, Proposition 9. As nkn^k is an open ideal of AA (since it contains mkm^k), hh is bijective and hence so is h′h'. This shows first that (nAn)k=j′((n^A^n^)k)(nA_n)^k = j'((\hat{n}\hat{A}_{\hat{n}})^k) and hence the topology on AnA_n is induced by that on AnA_n; moreover, A^n^=An+(n^A^n^)k\hat{A}_{\hat{n}} = A_n + (\hat{n}\hat{A}_{\hat{n}})^k for all k>0k > 0 and hence AnA_n is everywhere dense in AnA_n.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.