Bourbaki

Theorem 3

Tag 04QK, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04QK].

Commutative Algebra, chapter V, § 2. The lift of prime ideals

Let AA be an integrally closed domain and A′A' a ring containing AA and integral over AA. Suppose that 00 is the only element of AA which is a divisor of 00 in A′A'. Let p,qp, q be two prime ideals of AA such that q⊃pq \supset p and q′q' a prime ideal of AA lying above qq. Then there exists a prime ideal p′p' of AA lying above pp and such that q′⊃p′q' \supset p'.

Suppose first that A′A' is an integral domain. Let K,K′K, K' be the fields of fractions of AA and A′A' respectively; let K′′K'' be the algebraic closure of KK and AA the integral closure of AA in K′′K''; then A⊂A′⊂A′′A \subset A' \subset A''. Let p′′p'' be a prime ideal of A′′A'' lying above pp (no. 1, Theorem 1), q′′q'' a prime ideal of A′′A'' lying above qq and such that p′′⊂q′′p'' \subset q'' (no. 1, Corollary 2 to Theorem 1) and finally q1′′q_1'' a prime ideal of A′′A'' lying above q′q' (no. 1, Theorem 1). By no. 3, Proposition 6 (i), there exists a KK-automorphism σ\sigma of K′′K'' such that Q.q′′=q1′′Q.q'' = q_1''. Then Q.p′′Q.p'' is a prime ideal of A′′A'' lying above pp such that Q.p′′=q1′′Q.p'' = q_1'' and hence p′=A′∩σ.p′′p' = A' \cap \sigma.p'' is a prime ideal of A′A' lying above pp and contained in A′∩q1′′=q′A' \cap q_1'' = q'.

We pass to the general case. As AA is an integral domain and q′q' is prime, the subsets A−{0}A - \{0\} and A′−q′A' - q' of A′A' are multiplicative; then their product S=(A−{0})(A′−q′)S = (A - \{0\})(A' - q') is a multiplicative subset of A′A' which does not contain 0 since the non-zero elements of AA are not divisors of 0 in A′A'. Then there exists (Chapter II, §2, no. 5, Corollary 2 to Proposition 11) a prime ideal m′m' of A′A' disjoint from SS, in other words such that m′⊂q′m' \subset q' and m′∩A=0m' \cap A = 0. Let hh be the canonical homomorphism A′→A′/m′A' \to A'/m'. The restriction of hh to AA is injective and hence h(A)h(A) is integrally closed. As m′⊂q′m' \subset q', h(q′)h(q') is a prime ideal of A′/m′A'/m' lying above h(q)h(q); since A′/m′A'/m' is an integral domain, the first part of the proof proves that there exists a prime ideal n′n' of A′/m′A'/m' such that n′∩h(A)=h(p)n' \cap h(A) = h(p) and h(q′)⊃n′h(q') \supset n'. The ideal p′=h−1(n′)p' = h^{-1}(n') is a prime ideal of A′A' and q′⊃p′q' \supset p', since q′q' contains the kernel of hh. As n′⊃h(p)n' \supset h(p), p′⊃pp' \supset p. Finally, for x∈p′∩Ax \in p' \cap A, h(x)∈n′∩h(A)=h(p)h(x) \in n' \cap h(A) = h(p) and hence x∈px \in p since the restriction of hh to AA is injective; hence p′∩A=pp' \cap A = p.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.