Theorem 3
Tag 04QK, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04QK].
Commutative Algebra, chapter V, § 2. The lift of prime ideals
Let be an integrally closed domain and a ring containing and integral over . Suppose that is the only element of which is a divisor of in . Let be two prime ideals of such that and a prime ideal of lying above . Then there exists a prime ideal of lying above and such that .
Suppose first that is an integral domain. Let be the fields of fractions of and respectively; let be the algebraic closure of and the integral closure of in ; then . Let be a prime ideal of lying above (no. 1, Theorem 1), a prime ideal of lying above and such that (no. 1, Corollary 2 to Theorem 1) and finally a prime ideal of lying above (no. 1, Theorem 1). By no. 3, Proposition 6 (i), there exists a -automorphism of such that . Then is a prime ideal of lying above such that and hence is a prime ideal of lying above and contained in .
We pass to the general case. As is an integral domain and is prime, the subsets and of are multiplicative; then their product is a multiplicative subset of which does not contain 0 since the non-zero elements of are not divisors of 0 in . Then there exists (Chapter II, §2, no. 5, Corollary 2 to Proposition 11) a prime ideal of disjoint from , in other words such that and . Let be the canonical homomorphism . The restriction of to is injective and hence is integrally closed. As , is a prime ideal of lying above ; since is an integral domain, the first part of the proof proves that there exists a prime ideal of such that and . The ideal is a prime ideal of and , since contains the kernel of . As , . Finally, for , and hence since the restriction of to is injective; hence .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.