Bourbaki

Corollary

Tag 06CG, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06CG].

Algebra, chapter IV, § 4. Formal power series

— Let fi(Y1,Y2,…,Yq,X1,X2,…,Xp)f_i(Y_1, Y_2, \ldots, Y_q, X_1, X_2, \ldots, X_p) (1≤i≤q1 \leq i \leq q) be qq formal power series without constant term in A[[Y1,…,Yq,X1,…,Xp]]A[[Y_1, \ldots, Y_q, X_1, \ldots, X_p]]. If the constant term of the formal power series D=det⁡(∂fi∂Yj)D = \det \left( \frac{\partial f_i}{\partial Y_j} \right) is invertible in AA, then there exists precisely one system of qq formal power series u1(X1,…,Xp),…,uq(X1,…,Xp)u_1(X_1, \ldots, X_p), \ldots, u_q(X_1, \ldots, X_p) such that

fi(u1,…,uq,X1,…,Xp)=0(1≤i≤q). f_i(u_1, \ldots, u_q, X_1, \ldots, X_p) = 0 \quad (1 \leq i \leq q).
Put fq+1=X1,…,fq+p=Xpf_{q+1} = X_1, \ldots, f_{q+p} = X_p, f=(f1,…,fp+q)f = (f_1, \ldots, f_{p+q}), then det⁡Tf\det T_f is equal to the constant term of DD, hence invertible in AA; therefore TfT_f is invertible. By Prop. 10 there exist formal power series without constant term
g1,…,gq+p∈A[[Y1,…,Yq,X1,…,Xp]] g_1, \ldots, g_{q+p} \in A[[Y_1, \ldots, Y_q, X_1, \ldots, X_p]]
such that on writing
g=(g1,…,gp+q),1p+q=(Y1,…,Yq,X1,…,Xp) g = (g_1, \ldots, g_{p+q}), \quad 1_{p+q} = (Y_1, \ldots, Y_q, X_1, \ldots, X_p)
we have f∘g=g∘f=1p+qf \circ g = g \circ f = 1_{p+q}. The relation f∘g=1p+qf \circ g = 1_{p+q}, in particular gives
gq+1=X1,…,gq+p=Xp. g_{q+1} = X_1, \ldots, g_{q+p} = X_p.
Hence
fi(g1,…,gq,X1,…,Xp)=Yi(1≤i≤q). f_i(g_1, \ldots, g_q, X_1, \ldots, X_p) = Y_i \quad (1 \leq i \leq q).
Now put
ui(X1,…,Xp)=gi(0,…,0,X1,…,Xp)(1≤i≤q); u_i(X_1, \ldots, X_p) = g_i(0, \ldots, 0, X_1, \ldots, X_p) \quad (1 \leq i \leq q);
substituting 0 for each YiY_i in (30) we obtain the desired relation (29).

Conversely, suppose that the formal power series u1,…,uqu_1, \ldots, u_q in the ring A[[X1,…,Xp]]A[[X_1, \ldots, X_p]] satisfy the relation (29). The relation g∘f=1p+qg \circ f = 1_{p+q} implies

gi(f1,…,fq,X1,…,Xp)=Yi(1≤i≤q); g_i(f_1, \ldots, f_q, X_1, \ldots, X_p) = Y_i \quad (1 \leq i \leq q);
and substituting uiu_i for YiY_i for 1≤i≤q1 \leq i \leq q in (32), we obtain (31), whence the uniqueness of the solution of the system (29).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.