— Let fi(Y1,Y2,…,Yq,X1,X2,…,Xp) (1≤i≤q) be q formal power series without constant term in A[[Y1,…,Yq,X1,…,Xp]]. If the constant term of the formal power series D=det(∂Yj∂fi) is invertible in A, then there exists precisely one system of q formal power series u1(X1,…,Xp),…,uq(X1,…,Xp) such that
fi(u1,…,uq,X1,…,Xp)=0(1≤i≤q). Put
fq+1=X1,…,fq+p=Xp,
f=(f1,…,fp+q), then
detTf is equal to the constant term of
D, hence invertible in
A; therefore
Tf is invertible. By Prop. 10 there exist formal power series without constant term
g1,…,gq+p∈A[[Y1,…,Yq,X1,…,Xp]] such that on writing
g=(g1,…,gp+q),1p+q=(Y1,…,Yq,X1,…,Xp) we have
f∘g=g∘f=1p+q. The relation
f∘g=1p+q, in particular gives
gq+1=X1,…,gq+p=Xp. Hence
fi(g1,…,gq,X1,…,Xp)=Yi(1≤i≤q). Now put
ui(X1,…,Xp)=gi(0,…,0,X1,…,Xp)(1≤i≤q); substituting 0 for each
Yi in (30) we obtain the desired relation (29).
Conversely, suppose that the formal power series u1,…,uq in the ring A[[X1,…,Xp]] satisfy the relation (29). The relation g∘f=1p+q implies
gi(f1,…,fq,X1,…,Xp)=Yi(1≤i≤q); and substituting
ui for
Yi for
1≤i≤q in (32), we obtain (31), whence the uniqueness of the solution of the system (29).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.