Proposition 12
Tag 06CI, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06CI].
Algebra, chapter IV, § 4. Formal power series
— Every non-zero element of may be written in a unique way as , where and is a formal power series in of order 0.
Let , where are non-zero elements of . We have , where and are formal power series of order 0, hence invertible in (IV, p. 30, Prop. 6). Then and is a formal power series of order 0.
Let us prove the uniqueness. Suppose that where and are formal power series of order 0. Since is a formal power series of order 0, we have whence and this proves the uniqueness assertion.
We shall say that the elements of are generalized formal power series in with coefficients in , or simply formal power series when no confusion can arise (the elements of are then called formal power series with positive exponents); if , the integer defined in Prop. 12 is also called the order of and is written , even if it is ; we also put . It may be verified at once that
still hold for generalized formal power series. In particular, if , then . \* In other words (Comm. Alg., VI, § 3, No. 6, p. 392, Def. 3), w is a normalized discrete valuation of the field . \*
For each integer let be the set of all such that . Then (p.), , , is a decreasing sequence of subgroups of the additive group , with intersection 0 ; there exists thus a topology on , invariant under translation, for which is a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of 0 (Gen. Top., III, p. 223). We can easily verify that is a topological field (Gen. Top., III, p. 281) and that is an open and closed subspace of .
Let be a family of elements of , and suppose that there exists an integer N such that for all . Then the family' is summable in (Gen. Top., III, p. 263, Cor.) ; put , then if and only if for all ; otherwise the order of is the least integer k such that . Finally every element of may be written in a unique fashion in the form , where the sequence satisfies for all sufficiently large n.
Since the ring is a subring of , every rational fraction (u, v being polynomials in X) may be identified with the (generalized) formal power series of , which we shall call its expansion at the origin ; the field is thus identified with a subfield of .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Cites
- Comm. Alg., VI, § 3, No. 6, p. 392, Def. 3 not yet on this site: AC VI
- IV, p. 30, Prop. 6
- Gen. Top., III, p. 223
- Gen. Top., III, p. 263
- Gen. Top., III, p. 281