Bourbaki

Remark

Tag 06EH, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06EH].

Algebra, chapter IV, § 6. Symmetric functions

— Let n and k be two positive integers. We denote by Δk,n\Delta_{k,n} the set of elements of length k in NnN^n and further equip AA, , with the order relation, written a≤βa \leq \beta, induced by the lexicographic order on NnN^n (Set Theory, III, p. 157), and define an action of the group Sn\mathfrak{S}_n on NnN^n by (σa)(i)=a(σ−1(i))(\sigma a)(i) = a(\sigma^{-1}(i)) for σ∈Sn,a∈Nn\sigma \in \mathfrak{S}_n, a \in N^n and l≤i≤nl \leq i \leq n. Moreover, we denote by DkD_k the set of elements a=(α(1),…,α(k))a = (\alpha(1), \ldots, \alpha(k)) of Nk\mathbf{N}^k such that

α(1)≥α(2)≥⋯≥α(k),α(1)+⋯+α(k)=k. \alpha(1) \geq \alpha(2) \geq \cdots \geq \alpha(k), \quad \alpha(1) + \cdots + \alpha(k) = k.

Suppose that k≤nk \leq n and let us identify Nk\mathbf{N}^k with a subset of NnN^n by the mapping (a(1),…,a(k))↦(a(1),…,a(k),0,…,0)(a(1), \ldots, a(k)) \mapsto (a(1), \ldots, a(k), 0, \ldots, 0). Then DkD_k consists of the elements aa of Δk,n\Delta_{k,n} such that σa≤a\sigma a \leq a for all σ∈Sn\sigma \in \mathfrak{S}_n. It follows that every orbit of the group Sn\mathfrak{S}_n in AA, , contains a unique element of DkD_k. For every a∈Dka \in D_k let O(a)O(a) be the orbit of aa in Δk,n\Delta_{k,n} under the operation of Sn\mathfrak{S}_n; put

M(α)=∑β∈O(α)Xβ. M(\alpha) = \sum_{\beta \in O(\alpha)} X^\beta.

It follows from Lemma 1 of IV, p. 47, that the family (M(α))α∈Dk(\mathbf{M}(\alpha))_{\alpha \in D_k} is a basis of the A-module Sk(n)S_k^{(n)}.

For each α∈Dk\alpha \in D_k put

(12)S(α)=∏i=1ksiα(i)−α(i+1)(where it is understood that a (k+1)=0); (12)\quad S(\alpha) = \prod_{i=1}^k s_i^{\alpha(i) - \alpha(i+1)} \quad \text{(where it is understood that } a\ (k+1) = 0 \text{)} ;

since we have ∑i=1ki⋅(a(i)−a(i+1))=∑i=1ka(i)=k\sum_{i=1}^k i \cdot (a(i) - a(i+1)) = \sum_{i=1}^k a(i) = k, the symmetric polynomial S(α)S(\alpha) is homogeneous of degree kk. It follows directly from Th. 1 (IV, p. 62) that the family (S(α))α∈Dk(S(\alpha))_{\alpha \in D_k} is a basis of the A-module Sk(n)S_k^{(n)}.

Let α,β\alpha, \beta be in DkD_k, and let cαβc_{\alpha\beta} be the coefficient of the monomial XβX^\beta in the polynomial S(α)S(\alpha) defined by (12) in the case A=ZA = \mathbf{Z} and k=nk = n. This is then a positive integer, independent of the ring A and of the integer n. By formula (9) (IV, p. 64) we then have

(13)S(α)=∑β∈Dkcαβ⋅M(β)(α∈Dk). (13)\quad S(\alpha) = \sum_{\beta \in D_k} c_{\alpha\beta} \cdot \mathbf{M}(\beta) \quad (\alpha \in D_k) .

It may be shown (cf. IV, p. 101, Exercise 13) that the matrix C=(cαβ)α,β∈DkC = (c_{\alpha\beta})_{\alpha,\beta \in D_k} is such that cαα=1c_{\alpha\alpha} = 1 and cαβ=0c_{\alpha\beta} = 0 for α<β\alpha < \beta; generalizing the terminology introduced in II, p. 351, we shall say that CC belongs to the lower total triangular group. The same is true of the matrix D inverse to C. The values of the matrices C and D when 2≤k≤52 \leq k \leq 5, are given in the table (IV, p. 103-105).

Suppose now that n<kn < k and let us identify NnN^n with a subset of NkN^k by the mapping (a(1),…,a(n))↦(a(1),…,a(n),0,…,0)(a(1), \ldots, a(n)) \mapsto (a(1), \ldots, a(n), 0, \ldots, 0). For every aa in Dk∩NnD_k \cap N^n we again denote by O(α)O(\alpha) the orbit of aa in Δk,n\Delta_{k,n} under the operation of Sn\mathfrak{S}_n and define M(α)\mathbf{M}(\alpha) by (11). Further we define S(α)S(\alpha) by (12), then the families (M(a))a∈Dk∩Nn(\mathbf{M}(a))_{a \in D_k \cap N^n} and (S(a))a∈Dk∩Nn(S(a))_{a \in D_k \cap N^n} are bases of the A-module Sk(n)S_k^{(n)}. By formula (9) of IV, p. 64, we have a formula analogous to (13) where DkD_k is replaced by Dk∩NnD_k \cap N^n, with the same integers cαβc_{\alpha\beta}.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.