Let us define a continuous derivation A in A[[X]] by A(u)=∑n≥0nun, where for every u in A[[X]], un is the homogeneous component of degree n of u. By (16) and Prop. 2 of IV, p. 27 we have
1+k≥1∑sk=i∈I∏(1+Xi)
By Prop. 9 of IV, p. 34 we thus have
(k≥1∑ksk)⋅(1+k≥1∑sk)−1=i∈I∑Δ(Xi)/(1+Xi).
We have A(Xi)=Xi and Xi/(1+Xi)=∑k≥1(−1)kXik. The right-hand side of (20) is thus equal to ∑k≥1(−1)k−1pk. Hence by (20) we have
k≥1∑ksk=(1+k≥1∑sk)⋅(k≥1∑(−1)k−1pk)
and now Lemma 4 follows by a comparison of homogeneous components of degree d.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.