Proposition 4
Tag 06MN, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06MN].
Algebra, chapter V, § 10. Galois extensions
— Let be a Galois extension of . Then the Galois group is compact and totally disconnected.
Every element of has a base of neighbourhoods consisting of the open and closed sets , hence is totally disconnected (Gen. Top., I, p. 111). We have , hence is separated. For each the set of conjugates of , as ranges over , is finite because is algebraic over (V, p. Cor. 1); hence all the projections of on the factor spaces of are finite sets, and this shows to be relatively compact in (Gen. Top., I, p. 88). It remains to show that is closed in . Now if is in the closure of in , then for each pair of points of there exists with , whence and . By the same reasoning we have for all , hence is a -homomorphism of into ; since is algebraic over , is a -automorphism of (V, p. 52, Prop. 1), hence .
Let be a Galois extension of and an increasing directed family of subextensions of . Suppose that is Galois over for all and that . For each denote by the Galois group of over ; for in we have and the restriction homomorphism of into is defined. It is continuous and so the family is an inverse system of topological groups. Further, for each denote by the restriction homomorphism of into ; it is continuous and we have for , hence the family defines a continuous homomorphism of into .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.