Bourbaki

Proposition 9

Tag 06TZ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06TZ].

Algebra, chapter V, § 15. Separable extensions

— Let L be an extension of a field K and M a commutative L-algebra (for example, an extension of L). If M is separable over L and L is separable over K, then M is separable over K.

Let K' be an extension of K. Since L is a separable extension of K, the ring K′⊗KLK' \otimes_K L is reduced; since M is a separable L-algebra, Prop. 5 (V, p. 120) shows the ring (K′⊗KL)⊗LM(K' \otimes_K L) \otimes_L M to be reduced. Now the ring K′⊗KMK' \otimes_K M is isomorphic to (K′⊗KL)⊗LM(K' \otimes_K L) \otimes_L M (II, p. 278, Prop. 2), hence is reduced. This proves that M is separable over K.

If the extension M is separable over K, it is not necessarily separable over L (cf. however V, p. 124, Cor. 3). For example, if p is a prime number, the field Fp(X)F_p(X) of rational fractions in one indeterminate X over FpF_p is separable over FpF_p (V, p. 121, Prop. 6) but it is a p-radical algebraic extension of Fp(Xp)F_p(X^p); in particular Fp(X)F_p(X) is not separable over Fp(Xp)F_p(X^p).

Later (V, p. 137 Prop. 5) we shall study the separability of composite extensions.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.