Theorem 4
Tag 06V4, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06V4].
Algebra, V, p. 133, § 16. Differential criteria of separability
Let P be a perfect field, L an extension of P and K a subextension of L; we suppose that L is a finitely generated extension of K. Then the canonical L-linear mapping has index equal to the transcendence degree of L over K.
If and are two subextensions of such that , we denote by the canonical -linear mapping of into and when it is defined, the index of will be written . If and are three subextensions of such that , we have a commutative diagram
where is the canonical isomorphism defined in Prop. 2 (II, p. 278). Since the index is clearly invariant under extension by scalars and the index of an isomorphism is zero, Lemma 2 (, p. 133) shows that the index is defined when and are and then
Since is a finitely generated extension of , Formula (5) and the Cor. of , p. 111 shows that it is enough to consider the case where exists such that ; further if is algebraic over , there exists a power of the characteristic exponent of such that is separable algebraic over (, p. 44, Prop. 13). So it is enough to establish the equality in the three special cases below:
a) is transcendental over : then is injective and its cokernel is of rank 1 over (, p. 129, Cor.) ; so we have and also .
b) is separable algebraic over : then is bijective (, p. 130, Cor. 2), whence ; clearly also .
c) The field is of characteristic , and is in : the cokernel of is isomorphic to , and since is a -basis of over , the space is of dimension 1 over (, p. 102, Th. 1). Since is a -th power in , we have and the kernel of contains the subspace of generated by . For each let be the residue class of mod ; then is a -derivation of into such that . Prop. 5 (, p. 101) shows that extends to a -derivation of into . Hence there exists an -linear mapping such that and is the canonical mapping of onto . This proves to be the kernel of . Since is perfect, we have , whence and finally (, p. 103, Prop. 6). The kernel and cokernel of are thus of dimension 1, whence , and we also have .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.