Corollary 2
Tag 07EG, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07EG].
Topological Vector Spaces, II, p. 28, § 4. Locally convex spaces
Let be a partition of the index set A. Let be a family of locally convex spaces and be a family of vector spaces. For each , let be a linear mapping of in a vector space E; for each and , let be a linear mapping of in . Write . Suppose that each carries the finest locally convex topology that makes the () continuous. Then, the finest locally convex topology on E that makes the continuous, is identical with the finest locally convex topology making the continuous.
This is a particular case of S, IV, § 2.5 criterion CST 19, and can also be proved directly using prop. 5.
Examples of locally convex final topologies.
I. Quotient space.
Let M be a subspace of the locally convex space F, and φ be the canonical mapping of F on F/M. As the quotient topology on F/M is locally convex and is the finest of all the topologies (locally convex or not) which make φ continuous, it is also the locally convex final topology for the family consisting of the single mapping φ.
II. Inductive limits of locally convex spaces.
Let A be an ordered set directed to the right and let be an inductive system of vector spaces relative to the set A (A, II, § 6.2); let and let be the canonical linear mapping for each . Suppose that each carries a locally convex topology , and further suppose that for , the mapping is continuous. Then we say that the locally convex final topology of the family relative to the linear mappings (resp. the space E carrying the topology ) is the inductive limit of the family (resp. the inductive limit space of the system , or simply of the locally convex spaces ). Recall that E is the union of the vector subspaces and that when , we have ; if we endow with the final topology for the mapping (which is the same as identifying with the quotient space ), the topology is also the final topology of the family of the topologies of the , relative to the canonical injections (II, cor. 2 above). Further, the continuity of for implies that the canonical injection is continuous, so that E is also the inductive limit of carrying the preceding topologies relative to the injection .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.