Bourbaki

Definition 2

Tag 07H4, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07H4].

Topological Vector Spaces, chapter II, § 6. Weak topologies

— Let F and G be two vector spaces put in duality by the bilinear form B. The coarsest topology on F that makes all the linear forms B(.,y):x↦B(x,y)B(., y): x \mapsto B(x, y) continuous, where y varies in G, is called the weak topology on F defined by the duality between F and G, and we denote it by σ(F,G)\sigma(F, G).

Similarly we define the weak topology σ(G,F)\sigma(G, F) on G, interchanging F and G in definition 1 ; this possibility of interchanging F and G applies to all the results and definitions that follow in this paragraph.

We use the adjective « weak » and the adverb « weakly » to denote properties relative to a weak topology σ(F,G)\sigma(F, G) provided there is no possibility of confusion. We shall speak, for example, of « weak convergence » and « weakly continuous functions » etc.

When G⊂F∗G \subset F^*, the notation σ(F,G)\sigma(F, G) will always denote the weak topology defined by the duality corresponding to the restriction to F×GF \times G of the canonical bilinear form (x,x∗)↦⟨x,x∗⟩(x, x^*) \mapsto \langle x, x^* \rangle.

Without extra hypotheses on F and G, we often write ⟨x,y⟩\langle x, y \rangle for the value B(x,y)B(x, y) of the bilinear form B at (x,y)(x, y), provided there is no ambiguity ; we shall adopt this convention in the rest of this paragraph.

A vector space F carrying a weak topology of σ(F,G)\sigma(F, G) will be called a weak space.

A weak topology σ(F,G)\sigma(F, G) is locally convex (II, p. 26, prop. 4) ; more precisely, it is the inverse image of the product topology of RG\mathbf{R}^G by the linear mapping ϕ:x↦(⟨x,y⟩)y∈G\phi : x \mapsto (\langle x, y \rangle)_{y \in G} of F in RG\mathbf{R}^G. It is defined by the set of semi-norms x↦∣⟨x,y⟩∣x \mapsto |\langle x, y \rangle| when y varies in G (II, p. 5). For every α>0\alpha > 0, and every finite family (yi)1≤i≤n(y_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n} of points of G, let W(y1,...,yn;α)W(y_1, ..., y_n; \alpha) be the set of the x∈Fx \in F such that ∣⟨x,yi⟩∣≤α|\langle x, y_i \rangle| \leq \alpha for 1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n; these sets (for α,n\alpha, n and yiy_i arbitrary) form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of 0 for σ(F,G)\sigma(F, G). Note that W(y1,...,yn;α)W(y_1, ..., y_n; \alpha) contains that vector subspace of F, of finite codimension, which is defined by the equations ⟨x,yi⟩=0\langle x, y_i \rangle = 0 for 1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.