Definition 2
Tag 07H4, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07H4].
Topological Vector Spaces, chapter II, § 6. Weak topologies
— Let F and G be two vector spaces put in duality by the bilinear form B. The coarsest topology on F that makes all the linear forms continuous, where y varies in G, is called the weak topology on F defined by the duality between F and G, and we denote it by .
Similarly we define the weak topology on G, interchanging F and G in definition 1 ; this possibility of interchanging F and G applies to all the results and definitions that follow in this paragraph.
We use the adjective « weak » and the adverb « weakly » to denote properties relative to a weak topology provided there is no possibility of confusion. We shall speak, for example, of « weak convergence » and « weakly continuous functions » etc.
When , the notation will always denote the weak topology defined by the duality corresponding to the restriction to of the canonical bilinear form .
Without extra hypotheses on F and G, we often write for the value of the bilinear form B at , provided there is no ambiguity ; we shall adopt this convention in the rest of this paragraph.
A vector space F carrying a weak topology of will be called a weak space.
A weak topology is locally convex (II, p. 26, prop. 4) ; more precisely, it is the inverse image of the product topology of by the linear mapping of F in . It is defined by the set of semi-norms when y varies in G (II, p. 5). For every , and every finite family of points of G, let be the set of the such that for ; these sets (for and arbitrary) form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of 0 for . Note that contains that vector subspace of F, of finite codimension, which is defined by the equations for .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.