Bourbaki

Proposition 14

Tag 07RG, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07RG].

Topological Vector Spaces, chapter IV, § 1. Duality

(i) The mapping θ\theta is an isomorphism from the strong (resp. weak) dual of S=⨁i∈IEiS = \bigoplus_{i \in I} E_i onto the product of the strong (resp. weak) duals of the EiE_i:

(ii) For a subset AA of S′S' to be equicontinuous, it is necessary and sufficient that the projection of θ(A)\theta(A) onto Ei′E_i' be equicontinuous for all i∈Ii \in I.

(iii) The Mackey topology τ(S,S′)\tau(S, S') is the direct sum of the Mackey topologies τ(Ei,Ei′)\tau(E_i, E_i').

(iv) The topology β(S,S′)\beta(S, S') is the direct sum of the topologies β(Ei,Ei′)\beta(E_i, E_i').

That θ\theta is bijective follows immediately from the definition of a topological direct sum (II, p. 30, prop. 6). Assertion (i) then follows from prop. 12 of IV, p. 12, for the strong topologies, and from prop. 8 of II, p. 50, for the weak topologies. Similarly (iii) follows from prop. 13 (IV, p. 12) and (iv) from prop. 12 (IV, p. 12).

To prove (ii), let AA be a subset of S′S'. Put

q(x)=sup⁡x′∈A∣⟨x,x′⟩∣forx∈S; q(x) = \sup_{x' \in A} |\langle x, x' \rangle| \quad \text{for} \quad x \in S ;

let qiq_i denote the restriction of qq to EiE_i, whence

qi(xi)=sup⁡xi′∈Ai∣⟨xi,xi′⟩∣forxi∈Ei, q_i(x_i) = \sup_{x_i' \in A_i} |\langle x_i, x_i' \rangle| \quad \text{for} \quad x_i \in E_i ,

where AiA_i denotes the projection of θ(A)\theta(A) on Ei′E_i'. For AA to be equicontinuous, it is necessary and sufficient that qq is finite (that is, that each qiq_i is finite) and continuous. In view of the characterization of continuous semi-norms on a topological direct sum (II, p. 27, prop. 5), this is the same as assuming that each qiq_i is continuous, or in fact, that each set AiA_i is equicontinuous.

Let ϕ\phi be the linear mapping, said to be canonical, from ⨁i∈IEi′\bigoplus_{i \in I} E_i' into the dual P′P' of P=∏i∈IEiP = \prod_{i \in I} E_i, defined by the formula

⟨x,ϕ(x′)⟩=∑i∈I⟨xi,xi′⟩ \langle x, \phi(x') \rangle = \sum_{i \in I} \langle x_i, x'_i \rangle

for x=(xi)x = (x_i) in PP and x′=(xi′)x' = (x'_i) in ⨁i∈IEi′\bigoplus_{i \in I} E'_i.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.