Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 07TU, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07TU].

Topological Vector Spaces, chapter IV, § 3. Dual of a Fréchet space

— Let E be a locally convex space. The following conditions are equivalent :

(i) Let U be a subset of E which absorbs every bounded subset of E, and which is the intersection of a sequence of convex, balanced and closed neighbourhoods of 0 in E. Then U is a neighbourhood of 0 in E.

(ii) For every locally convex space F, every bounded subset of Lb(E;F)\mathscr{L}_b(E; F) which is the union of a countable family of equicontinuous subsets, is equicontinuous.

(iii) In the strong dual Eb′E'_b of E, every bounded subset which is the union of a countable family of equicontinuous subsets, is equicontinuous.

It is clear that (iii) is a particular case of (ii).

(i) ⇒\Rightarrow (ii) : let H be a bounded subset of Lb(E;F)\mathscr{L}_b(E; F), and let (Hn)(H_n) be a sequence of equicontinuous subsets of Lb(E;F)\mathscr{L}_b(E; F) such that H=⋃HnH = \bigcup H_n. Let V be a convex, balanced and closed neighbourhood of 0 in F. For every nn, the set Wn=⋂u∈Hnu−1(V)W_n = \bigcap_{u \in H_n} u^{-1}(V) is a convex, balanced and closed neighbourhood of 0 in E since HnH_n is equicontinuous. The set W=⋂u∈Hu−1(V)W = \bigcap_{u \in H} u^{-1}(V) absorbs every bounded subset of E, since H is bounded in Lb(E;F)\mathscr{L}_b(E; F) (III, p. 22), and we have W=⋂nWnW = \bigcap_n W_n. If E satisfies (i), then the set W is a neighbourhood of 0 in E, hence H is equicontinuous.

(iii) ⇒\Rightarrow (i) : let (Un)(U_n) be a sequence of convex, balanced and closed neighbourhoods of 0 in E. We assume that the set U=⋂nUnU = \bigcap_n U_n absorbs every bounded subset of E, hence that its polar U∘U^\circ is bounded in Eb′E'_b. Then the set B=⋃nUn∘B = \bigcup_n U_n^\circ is contained in U∘U^\circ, hence is bounded in Eb′E'_b. If E satisfies (iii), the set B is equicontinuous in E′E'; consequently, the polar B∘=⋂n(Un∘)∘=⋂nUn=UB^\circ = \bigcap_n (U_n^\circ)^\circ = \bigcap_n U_n = U of B in E is a neighbourhood of 0 in E.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.