Bourbaki

Theorem 1 (Banach-Dieudonné)

Tag 07U2, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07U2].

Topological Vector Spaces, chapter IV, § 3. Dual of a Fréchet space

— Let E be a locally convex metrizable space. The following topologies coincide on the dual E′E' of E :

a) the topology TN\mathscr{T}_\mathfrak{N} of N\mathfrak{N}-convergence, where N\mathfrak{N} is the family of subsets of E each consisting of points of a sequence converging to 0 ; b) the topology Tc\mathscr{T}_c of uniform convergence on compact subsets of E ; c) the topology Tpc\mathscr{T}_{pc} of uniform convergence on precompact subsets of E ; d) the topology Tf\mathscr{T}_f which is the finest topology inducing the same topology as σ(E′,E)\sigma(E', E) on every equicontinuous subset of E′E'.

First observe that a subset A of E′E' is closed for Tf\mathscr{T}_f if and only if A∩HA \cap H is closed for σ(E′,E)\sigma(E', E) for every subset H of E′E' which is equicontinuous and closed for σ(E′,E)\sigma(E', E). The weak topology σ(E′,E)\sigma(E', E) and Tpc\mathscr{T}_{pc} induce the same topology on every equicontinuous subset of E′E' (III, p. 17, prop. 5). Consequently each of the topologies TN\mathscr{T}_\mathfrak{N}, Tc\mathscr{T}_c, Tpc\mathscr{T}_{pc}, Tf\mathscr{T}_f is coarser than the one following it. It is therefore enough to prove that TN\mathscr{T}_\mathfrak{N} is finer than Tf\mathscr{T}_f. Moreover, every translation in E′E' is a homeomorphism for Tf\mathscr{T}_f. Hence it is enough to prove that, if F is a subset of E′E' which is closed for Tf\mathscr{T}_f, and does not contain 0, then there exists a set S∈NS \in \mathfrak{N} such that S∘∩F=∅S^\circ \cap F = \varnothing.

Let (Un)n≥0(U_n)_{n \geq 0} be a decreasing sequence of neighbourhoods of 0 in E forming a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of 0. We shall construct, by induction on n≥0n \geq 0, finite sets XnX_n such that we have

Xn⊂Un X_n \subset U_n
(⋃0≤p≤nXp)∘∩Un+1∘∩F=∅ \left( \bigcup_{0 \leq p \leq n} X_p \right)^\circ \cap U_{n+1}^\circ \cap F = \varnothing

for every integer n⩾0n \geqslant 0. Let m⩾0m \geqslant 0 be an integer such that XnX_n has been constructed for 0⩽n<m0 \leqslant n < m and satisfies (4) and (5) for 0⩽n<m0 \leqslant n < m. For every x∈Umx \in U_m, put

Fx=(⋃0⩽p<mXp)∘∩{x}∘∩Um+1∘∩F. F_x = (\bigcup_{0 \leqslant p < m} X_p)^{\circ} \cap \{x\}^{\circ} \cap U_{m+1}^{\circ} \cap F.
Formula (5) with n=m−1n = m - 1 implies that ⋂x∈UmFx=∅\bigcap_{x \in U_m} F_x = \varnothing. Further, the set Um+1∘U_{m+1}^{\circ} is equicontinuous, and compact for σ(E′,E)\sigma(E', E). In view of the definition of Tf\mathscr{T}_f, each of the sets FxF_x is compact for σ(E′,E)\sigma(E', E); therefore there exists a finite subset XmX_m of UmU_m such that ⋂x∈XmFx=∅\bigcap_{x \in X_m} F_x = \varnothing, i.e. relation (5) is satisfied for n=mn = m.

Put S=⋃n⩾0XnS = \bigcup_{n \geqslant 0} X_n. We have Xn⊂UpX_n \subset U_p for n⩾pn \geqslant p, therefore SS is the set of points of a sequence which converges to 0 in EE. From (5) we deduce that S∘∩Un+1∘∩F=∅S^{\circ} \cap U_{n+1}^{\circ} \cap F = \varnothing, and since E′E' is the union of the sequence of sets Un+1∘U_{n+1}^{\circ}, we get S∘∩F=∅S^{\circ} \cap F = \varnothing.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.