Bourbaki

Proposition 18

Tag 08M7, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 08M7].

Integration, chapter III, § 1. Measures on a locally compact space

On the cone M+(X)\mathscr{M}_+(X), the topologies induced by the following topologies coincide: T1\mathscr{T}_1: the topology of pointwise convergence in a linear subspace V of K(X;C)\mathscr{K}(X; \mathbf{C}) that is dense in K(X;C)\mathscr{K}(X; \mathbf{C}) and satisfies the property (P) (No. 7, Prop. 9);

\textit{\mathscr{T}_2: the vague topology;}

\textit{\mathscr{T}_3: the topology of strictly compact convergence.}

Since every filter is the intersection of the ultrafilters finer than it (GT, I, §6, No. 4, Prop. 7), it suffices to show that if U\mathfrak{U} is an ultrafilter on M+(X)\mathscr{M}_+(X) that converges to a measure μ0\mu_0 for the topology T1\mathscr{T}_1, then it also converges to μ0\mu_0 for T3\mathscr{T}_3. Let KK be a compact subset of XX; by hypothesis, there exists a function h∈Vh \in V that is ⩾0\geqslant 0 on XX and takes values >0> 0 on KK; it follows that every function f∈K(X,K;C)f \in \mathscr{K}(X, K; \mathbf{C}) may be written f=ghf = gh with g∈K(X,K;C)g \in \mathscr{K}(X, K; \mathbf{C}), and if c=inf⁡x∈Kh(x)>0c = \inf_{x \in K} h(x) > 0 then ∥g∥⩽c−1∥f∥\|g\| \leqslant c^{-1}\|f\|. By hypothesis, there exists a set H0∈UH_0 \in \mathfrak{U} such that, for every measure μ∈H0\mu \in H_0,

0⩽μ(h)⩽μ0(h)+1=b. 0 \leqslant \mu(h) \leqslant \mu_0(h) + 1 = b.

Consequently, for every function f∈K(X;C)f \in \mathscr{K}(X; \mathbf{C}),

∣⟨f,h⋅μ⟩∣=∣⟨hf,μ⟩∣⩽∥f∥⋅μ(h)⩽b∥f∥ |\langle f, h \cdot \mu \rangle| = |\langle hf, \mu \rangle| \leqslant \|f\| \cdot \mu(h) \leqslant b \|f\|

for every measure μ∈H0\mu \in H_0; this proves that the set HH of measures h⋅μh \cdot \mu, where μ\mu runs over H0H_0, is \emph{vaguely bounded}. If U0\mathfrak{U}_0 is the ultrafilter induced by U\mathfrak{U} on H0H_0, the image of U0\mathfrak{U}_0 under the mapping μ↦h⋅μ\mu \mapsto h \cdot \mu is the base of an ultrafilter F\mathfrak{F} on HH, and since HH is relatively compact for the topology of strictly compact convergence (Prop. 17 and No. 9, Prop. 15), F\mathfrak{F} is convergent to a measure ν0\nu_0 for this topology. In other words, for any ε>0\varepsilon > 0 and any compact subset LL of K(X,K;C)\mathscr{K}(X, K; \mathbf{C}), there exists a subset NN of H0H_0 belonging to U\mathfrak{U} such that, for every function g∈Lg \in L and every pair of measures μ,μ′\mu, \mu' belonging to NN, one has ∣⟨g,h⋅μ⟩−⟨g,h⋅μ′⟩∣⩽ε|\langle g, h \cdot \mu \rangle - \langle g, h \cdot \mu' \rangle| \leqslant \varepsilon, that is,

∣⟨gh,μ⟩−⟨gh,μ′⟩∣⩽ε. |\langle gh, \mu \rangle - \langle gh, \mu' \rangle| \leqslant \varepsilon.

Now, we saw above that the mapping g↦ghg \mapsto gh is an \emph{automorphism} of the Banach space K(X,K;C)\mathscr{K}(X, K; \mathbf{C}). We have thus shown that U\mathfrak{U} is a \emph{Cauchy filter} on M+(X)\mathscr{M}_+(X) for the topology of strictly compact convergence. \emph{A fortiori}, it is a Cauchy filter for vague convergence, and Prop. 14 of No. 9 shows that it is vaguely convergent to a measure μ1\mu_1; moreover, since VV is dense in K(X;C)\mathscr{K}(X; \mathbf{C}), the hypothesis implies that μ1=μ0\mu_1 = \mu_0; finally, since U\mathfrak{U} is a Cauchy filter for the topology of strictly compact convergence, it also converges to μ0\mu_0 for this topology (GT, X, §1, No. 5, Prop. 5).

Q.E.D.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.