Bourbaki

Theorem 2 (Egoroff)

Tag 08UZ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 08UZ].

Integration, chapter IV, § 5. Measurable functions and sets

— *Let X be a locally compact space, μ a measure on X, A a countable set, F\mathfrak{F} a filter on A having a countable base, and (fα)α∈A(f_\alpha)_{\alpha \in A} a family of measurable mappings of X into a metrizable space F. Assume that lim⁡Ffα(x)=f(x)\lim_{\mathfrak{F}} f_\alpha(x) = f(x) exists in the complement of a locally negligible subset N of X. Under these conditions, 1° the function f (extended to N in any manner whatsoever) is measurable; 2° for every compact subset K of X and every ε>0\varepsilon > 0, there exists a compact set K1⊂KK_1 \subset K such that ∣μ∣(K−K1)≤ε|\mu|(K - K_1) \leq \varepsilon and such that the restrictions of the fαf_\alpha to K1K_1 are continuous and converge uniformly to f on K1K_1.

The first assertion obviously follows from the second, which we are going to prove. There exists a compact set K0⊂KK_0 \subset K such that ∣μ∣(K−K0)≤ε/2|\mu|(K - K_0) \leq \varepsilon/2 and such that the restrictions to K0K_0 of all the functions fαf_\alpha are continuous (No. 1, Prop. 2). Let (An)(A_n) be a decreasing countable base for the filter F\mathfrak{F}; let d be a metric on F compatible with the topology. For every pair of integers n>0, r>0n > 0,\ r > 0, let Bn,rB_{n,r} be the set of points x∈K0x \in K_0 such that, for at least one pair of indices α,β\alpha, \beta belonging to AnA_n, d(fα(x),fβ(x))≥1/rd(f_\alpha(x), f_\beta(x)) \geq 1/r; for fixed α\alpha and β\beta, the set of x∈K0x \in K_0 such that d(fα(x),fβ(x))≥1/rd(f_\alpha(x), f_\beta(x)) \geq 1/r is closed in K0K_0, hence is compact; consequently, Bn,rB_{n,r} is a countable union of compact sets contained in K0K_0, hence is integrable (§ 4, No. 5, Props. 6 and 8). If rr is fixed, the intersection of the decreasing sequence of sets Bn,rB_{n,r} (n=1,2,…n = 1, 2, \ldots) has measure zero, since fα(x)f_\alpha(x) tends to f(x)f(x) almost everywhere in K0K_0 with respect to the filter F\mathfrak{F}; thus lim⁡n→∞∣μ∣(Bn,r)=0\lim_{n \to \infty} |\mu|(B_{n,r}) = 0 (§ 4, No. 5, Cor. of Prop. 7), consequently there exists an integer nrn_r such that ∣μ∣(Bnr,r)≤ε/2r+2|\mu|(B_{n_r,r}) \leq \varepsilon/2^{r+2}. Let BB be the union (for r=1,2,…r = 1, 2, \ldots) of the sets Bnr,rB_{n_r,r}; BB is integrable and

∣μ∣(B)≤∑r=1∞∣μ∣(Bnr,r)≤ε/4 |\mu|(B) \leq \sum_{r=1}^\infty |\mu|(B_{n_r,r}) \leq \varepsilon/4

(§ 4, No. 5, Cor. of Prop. 8). Let CC be the complement of BB in K0K_0; by construction, fα(x)f_\alpha(x) converges uniformly to f(x)f(x) in CC with respect to the filter F\mathfrak{F}, and since the restrictions of the fαf_\alpha to CC are continuous, so is the restriction of ff to CC. It then suffices to take a compact set K1⊂CK_1 \subset C such that ∣μ∣(C−K1)≤ε/4|\mu|(C - K_1) \leq \varepsilon/4 in order to satisfy the conditions of the statement, since ∣μ∣(K−K1)=∣μ∣(K−K0)+∣μ∣(B)+∣μ∣(C−K1)≤ε|\mu|(K - K_1) = |\mu|(K - K_0) + |\mu|(B) + |\mu|(C - K_1) \leq \varepsilon.

The conclusions of Th. 2 do not necessarily hold if FF is not metrizable (Exer. 1). If FF is metrizable, and the set AA is not countable but the filter F\mathfrak{F} has a countable base, then the first conclusion of Th. 2 is again valid; for, if (An)(A_n) is a countable base for F\mathfrak{F} and αn\alpha_n is an element of AnA_n, then ff is the limit of the sequence (fαn)(f_{\alpha_n}) locally almost everywhere, hence is measurable; however, the second conclusion of Th. 2 is no longer necessarily valid (cf. Exer. 4).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.