Theorem 2 (Egoroff)
Tag 08UZ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 08UZ].
Integration, chapter IV, § 5. Measurable functions and sets
— *Let X be a locally compact space, μ a measure on X, A a countable set, a filter on A having a countable base, and a family of measurable mappings of X into a metrizable space F. Assume that exists in the complement of a locally negligible subset N of X. Under these conditions, 1° the function f (extended to N in any manner whatsoever) is measurable; 2° for every compact subset K of X and every , there exists a compact set such that and such that the restrictions of the to are continuous and converge uniformly to f on .
The first assertion obviously follows from the second, which we are going to prove. There exists a compact set such that and such that the restrictions to of all the functions are continuous (No. 1, Prop. 2). Let be a decreasing countable base for the filter ; let d be a metric on F compatible with the topology. For every pair of integers , let be the set of points such that, for at least one pair of indices belonging to , ; for fixed and , the set of such that is closed in , hence is compact; consequently, is a countable union of compact sets contained in , hence is integrable (§ 4, No. 5, Props. 6 and 8). If is fixed, the intersection of the decreasing sequence of sets () has measure zero, since tends to almost everywhere in with respect to the filter ; thus (§ 4, No. 5, Cor. of Prop. 7), consequently there exists an integer such that . Let be the union (for ) of the sets ; is integrable and
(§ 4, No. 5, Cor. of Prop. 8). Let be the complement of in ; by construction, converges uniformly to in with respect to the filter , and since the restrictions of the to are continuous, so is the restriction of to . It then suffices to take a compact set such that in order to satisfy the conditions of the statement, since .
The conclusions of Th. 2 do not necessarily hold if is not metrizable (Exer. 1). If is metrizable, and the set is not countable but the filter has a countable base, then the first conclusion of Th. 2 is again valid; for, if is a countable base for and is an element of , then is the limit of the sequence locally almost everywhere, hence is measurable; however, the second conclusion of Th. 2 is no longer necessarily valid (cf. Exer. 4).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
- Theorem 1, § 1
- Remark 2, § 4
- Theorem 4, § 5
- Theorem 5, § 5
- Proposition 2, § 6
- Proposition 3, § 4
- Exercise 15, § 5
- Lemma 2, § 2