Bourbaki

Proposition 19

Tag 08W8, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 08W8].

Integration, IV, p. 83, § 5. Measurable functions and sets

If the uniform space FF is metrizable and complete, then the uniform space S(A,μ;F)S(A, \mu; F) is complete.

There exists a locally countable family (Kλ)λ∈L(K_{\lambda})_{\lambda \in L} of compact subsets of AA such that the KλK_{\lambda} are pairwise disjoint and A−⋃λKλA - \bigcup_{\lambda} K_{\lambda} is locally negligible (No. 9, Prop. 14). By Prop. 17, S(A,μ;F)S(A, \mu; F) is isomorphic to the product ∏λ∈LS(Kλ,μ;F)\prod_{\lambda \in L} S(K_{\lambda}, \mu; F); we are thus reduced to proving the proposition when AA is integrable; S(A,μ;F)S(A, \mu; F) is then metrizable (Prop. 18) and, by Lemma 4, for every Cauchy sequence (fn)(f_n) in S(A,μ;F)\mathscr{S}(A, \mu; F) there exists a subsequence (fnk)(f_{n_k}) that is convergent in A−NA - N, where NN is negligible; the limit ff of (fnk)(f_{n_k}) (extended in any way whatsoever to all of AA) is then μ\mu-measurable, and it follows from the extension of Egoroff’s theorem mentioned in No. 10 that the sequence (fnk)(f_{n_k}) converges in measure to ff in AA. This implies that ff is a cluster point of the sequence (fn)(f_n) in S(A,μ;F)\mathscr{S}(A, \mu; F), and since the sequence (fn)(f_n) is by hypothesis a Cauchy sequence, it converges to ff.

Q.E.D.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.