Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 0927, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0927].

Integration, chapter V, § 4. Integration of positive point measures

— Let (π,g)(\pi, g) be a μ\mu-adapted pair, and let

ν=∫g(t)επ(t) dμ(t). \nu = \int g(t)\varepsilon_{\pi(t)}\, d\mu(t).

Let ff be a mapping of XX into a topological space GG, and let SS be the (μ\mu-measurable) set of points t∈Tt \in T such that g(t)>0g(t) > 0. In order that ff be ν\nu-measurable, it is necessary and sufficient that the restriction of f∘πf \circ \pi to SS be μ\mu-measurable.

Suppose first that ff is ν\nu-measurable. By hypothesis, the set K\mathscr{K} of compact subsets KK of SS, such that the restriction of π\pi to KK is continuous, is μ\mu-dense in SS (Ch. IV, §5, No. 10, Prop. 15). To show that the restriction of f∘πf \circ \pi to SS is μ\mu-measurable, it therefore suffices to prove that for every K∈KK \in \mathscr{K}, the set of compact subsets HH of KK, such that the restriction of f∘πf \circ \pi to HH is continuous, is μ\mu-dense in KK (Ch. IV, §5, No. 8, Prop. 13). But by hypothesis, there exists a partition of the compact set π(K)\pi(K) formed by a ν\nu-negligible set NN and a sequence of compact sets (Cn)(C_n) such that the restriction of ff to each CnC_n is continuous. Under these conditions, K∩π‾(N)K \cap \overline{\pi}(N) and the sets K∩π‾(Cn)K \cap \overline{\pi}(C_n) form a partition of KK; but K∩π‾(N)K \cap \overline{\pi}(N) is μ\mu-negligible by virtue of the Cor. of Th. 1 of No. 2, the sets K∩π‾(Cn)K \cap \overline{\pi}(C_n) are compact, and the restriction of f∘πf \circ \pi to each of the latter sets is continuous, which proves that the restriction of f∘πf \circ \pi to SS is μ\mu-measurable.

Conversely, suppose this to be the case; to show that ff is ν\nu-measurable, it suffices to prove that the set L\mathscr{L} of compact subsets LL of XX, such that the restriction of ff to LL is continuous, is ν\nu-dense (Ch. IV, §5, No. 10, Prop. 15). Let NN be a subset of XX such that N∩LN \cap L is ν\nu-negligible for every L∈LL \in \mathscr{L}, and let us show that NN is locally ν\nu-negligible. For this, we must show that π‾(N)∩S\overline{\pi}(N) \cap S is locally μ\mu-negligible (Cor. of Th. 1 of No. 2). Now, the set H\mathscr{H} of compact subsets HH of SS, such that the restrictions to HH of π\pi and f∘πf \circ \pi are continuous, is by hypothesis μ\mu-dense in SS (Ch. IV, §5, No. 10, Prop. 15). It therefore suffices to prove that π‾(N)∩H\overline{\pi}(N) \cap H is μ\mu-negligible for every H∈HH \in \mathscr{H}. Now, π(H)\pi(H) is compact and may be identified with the quotient space of HH by the equivalence relation π(t)=π(t′)\pi(t) = \pi(t'), π\pi being identified with the canonical mapping of HH onto this quotient space (GT, I, §5, No. 2, Prop. 3). Since the restriction of f∘πf \circ \pi to HH is continuous, the restriction of ff to π(H)\pi(H) is therefore continuous, in other words π(H)∈L\pi(H) \in \mathscr{L}, consequently N∩π(H)N \cap \pi(H) is ν\nu-negligible. By the Cor. of Th. 1 of No. 2, π‾(N∩π(H))∩S\overline{\pi}(N \cap \pi(H)) \cap S is locally μ\mu-negligible; the same is therefore true of the set

H∩π‾(N)⊂π‾(N∩π(H))∩S; H \cap \overline{\pi}(N) \subset \overline{\pi}(N \cap \pi(H)) \cap S;

but since HH is compact, H∩π‾(N)H \cap \overline{\pi}(N) is μ\mu-negligible, which completes the proof.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.