Proposition 3
Tag 0927, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0927].
Integration, chapter V, § 4. Integration of positive point measures
— Let be a -adapted pair, and let
Let be a mapping of into a topological space , and let be the (-measurable) set of points such that . In order that be -measurable, it is necessary and sufficient that the restriction of to be -measurable.
Suppose first that is -measurable. By hypothesis, the set of compact subsets of , such that the restriction of to is continuous, is -dense in (Ch. IV, §5, No. 10, Prop. 15). To show that the restriction of to is -measurable, it therefore suffices to prove that for every , the set of compact subsets of , such that the restriction of to is continuous, is -dense in (Ch. IV, §5, No. 8, Prop. 13). But by hypothesis, there exists a partition of the compact set formed by a -negligible set and a sequence of compact sets such that the restriction of to each is continuous. Under these conditions, and the sets form a partition of ; but is -negligible by virtue of the Cor. of Th. 1 of No. 2, the sets are compact, and the restriction of to each of the latter sets is continuous, which proves that the restriction of to is -measurable.
Conversely, suppose this to be the case; to show that is -measurable, it suffices to prove that the set of compact subsets of , such that the restriction of to is continuous, is -dense (Ch. IV, §5, No. 10, Prop. 15). Let be a subset of such that is -negligible for every , and let us show that is locally -negligible. For this, we must show that is locally -negligible (Cor. of Th. 1 of No. 2). Now, the set of compact subsets of , such that the restrictions to of and are continuous, is by hypothesis -dense in (Ch. IV, §5, No. 10, Prop. 15). It therefore suffices to prove that is -negligible for every . Now, is compact and may be identified with the quotient space of by the equivalence relation , being identified with the canonical mapping of onto this quotient space (GT, I, §5, No. 2, Prop. 3). Since the restriction of to is continuous, the restriction of to is therefore continuous, in other words , consequently is -negligible. By the Cor. of Th. 1 of No. 2, is locally -negligible; the same is therefore true of the set
but since is compact, is -negligible, which completes the proof.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
- Remark, § 4
- Theorem 2, § 4
- Proposition 4, § 5
- Proposition 3, § 6
- Proposition 2, § 7
- Lemma 2, § 2
- Theorem 4, § 2
Cites
- I, §5, No. 2, Prop. 3 not yet on this site
- IV, §5, No. 8, Prop. 13
- IV, §5, No. 10, Prop. 15
- Cor. of Th. 1