Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 09OO, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09OO].

Integration, chapter IX, § 2. Operations on measures

— Let ν\nu be a measure on T. For ν\nu to be of the form f⋅μf \cdot \mu, where ff is a locally μ\mu-integrable positive function, it is necessary and sufficient that every μ\mu-negligible compact set be ν\nu-negligible. If f′f' is a second locally μ\mu-integrable function such that ν=f′⋅μ\nu = f' \cdot \mu, then f=f′f = f' locally μ\mu-almost everywhere.

The condition is obviously necessary (Prop. 2). Conversely, suppose that every μ\mu-negligible compact set is ν\nu-negligible. Let us introduce a crushing (Kα)α∈A(K_\alpha)_{\alpha \in A} of T for the measure μ+ν\mu + \nu and let us set N=T−⋃α∈AKαN = T - \bigcup_{\alpha \in A} K_\alpha. It is clear that (Kα)α∈A(K_\alpha)_{\alpha \in A} is a crushing for μ\mu and for ν\nu, and Prop. 9 of §1, No. 8 therefore implies the following relations for every g∈F+g \in \mathscr{F}_+:

μ∙(g)=∑α∈AμKα∙(gKα),ν∙(g)=∑α∈AνKα∙(gKα). \mu^\bullet(g) = \sum_{\alpha \in A} \mu_{K_\alpha}^\bullet(g_{K_\alpha}), \quad \nu^\bullet(g) = \sum_{\alpha \in A} \nu_{K_\alpha}^\bullet(g_{K_\alpha}).

Consider a compact set C⊂KαC \subset K_\alpha that is μKα\mu_{K_\alpha}-negligible; then CC is locally μ\mu-negligible, hence locally ν\nu-negligible, and finally νKα\nu_{K_\alpha}-negligible by the definition of ν\nu. It then follows from the Lebesgue–Nikodym theorem (Ch. V, §5, No. 5, Th. 2) that νKα\nu_{K_\alpha} admits a density fαf_\alpha with respect to μKα\mu_{K_\alpha}. Let ff be the function that coincides with fαf_\alpha on each of the sets KαK_\alpha, and with 0 on NN; the function ff is μ\mu-measurable (Ch. IV, §5, No. 10, Prop. 16), and for every function g∈F+g \in \mathscr{F}_+ one has, by the above relations and Prop. 3 of Ch. V, §5, No. 3,

ν∙(g)=∑α∈AνKα∙(gKα)=∑α∈AμKα∙(fαgKα)=∑α∈AμKα∙((fg)Kα)=μ∙(fg). \nu^\bullet(g) = \sum_{\alpha \in A} \nu_{K_\alpha}^\bullet(g_{K_\alpha}) = \sum_{\alpha \in A} \mu_{K_\alpha}^\bullet(f_\alpha g_{K_\alpha}) = \sum_{\alpha \in A} \mu_{K_\alpha}^\bullet((f g)_{K_\alpha}) = \mu^\bullet(f g).

It then follows first of all that ff is locally μ\mu-integrable: if xx is a point of T, and if VV is a neighborhood of xx such that ν∙(V)<+∞\nu^\bullet(V) < +\infty, then μ∙(fφV)<+∞\mu^\bullet(f \varphi_V) < +\infty. Next, Prop. 2 shows that the measures ν\nu and f⋅μf \cdot \mu have the same essential upper integral. They are therefore equal (§1, No. 2, Cor. of Prop. 2). The uniqueness of ff being obvious based on the case of compact spaces, the proposition is established.

Remark 3). — The theory of integration with respect to a measure ν=f⋅μ\nu = f \cdot \mu reduces at once to the theory treated in Ch. V. For, let (Kα)α∈A(K_\alpha)_{\alpha \in A} be a crushing of T for μ\mu, hence for ν\nu, and let T′T' be the locally compact space defined in the Scholium of §1, No. 8; we can associate to μ\mu (resp. to ν\nu) a measure μ′\mu' (resp. ν′\nu') on T′T', in such a way that the measurable functions, the essentially integrable functions with values in a Banach space, and the essential upper integrals of positive functions, are the same for μ\mu and μ′\mu' (resp. for ν\nu and ν′\nu'). The function ff is therefore μ′\mu'-measurable; it is locally μ′\mu'-integrable, because T′T' is locally compact, and a compact subset of T′T' intersects only a finite number of the compact sets KαK_\alpha (α∈A\alpha \in A). Finally, the relation ν′∙(g)=ν∙(g)=μ∙(fg)=μ′∙(fg){\nu'}^\bullet(g) = \nu^\bullet(g) = \mu^\bullet(fg) = {\mu'}^\bullet(fg) proves that ν′=f⋅μ′\nu' = f \cdot \mu' (Ch. V, §5, No. 3, Prop. 3). We leave to the reader the task of transcribing the results of Ch. V, §5.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.