Bourbaki

Lemma 4

Tag 09PI, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09PI].

Integration, IX, p. 38, § 2. Operations on measures

Let XX be a topological space, ν\nu a measure on XX, and ff a ν\nu-measurable mapping of XX into a topological space FF (Hausdorff or not). There exists a universally measurable mapping f′f' of XX into FF, equal to ff locally ν\nu-almost everywhere.

The proof is identical to that of Prop. 7 of Ch. V, §3, No. 4, on taking into account Prop. 10 of §1, No. 8.

Let us pass to the proof of Prop. 13. A) Suppose that XX is compact and metrizable and that pp is continuous and surjective: The space TT is then compact and metrizable (GT, IX, §2, No. 10). By Th. 1 of Ch. VI, §3, No. 1, there exists a mapping H:t↦ηtH : t \mapsto \eta_t of TT into M+(X)\mathscr{M}_+(X), vaguely μ\mu-measurable and scalarly essentially μ\mu-integrable, such that ν=∫Tηt dμ(t)\nu = \int_T \eta_t \, d\mu(t) and such that ηt\eta_t has total mass 1 and is carried by p‾(t)\overline{p}(t) for every t∈Tt \in T. Let (Sn)n∈N(S_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} be a crushing of TT for μ\mu, such that the restriction of HH to each of the sets SnS_n is continuous (§1, No. 8, Props. 10 and 11); we denote by Λ:t↦λt\Lambda : t \mapsto \lambda_t the mapping of TT into M+(X)\mathscr{M}_+(X) that is equal to HH on S=⋃n∈NSnS = \bigcup_{n \in \mathbf{N}} S_n and to 0 on T−ST - S. It is clear that ν=∫Tλt dμ(t)\nu = \int_T \lambda_t \, d\mu(t) and that Λ\Lambda satisfies condition a) of the statement. Let θ\theta be a measure on TT; the mapping Λ\Lambda is vaguely θ\theta-measurable and scalarly essentially θ\theta-integrable, hence also θ\theta-adequate (Ch. V, §3, No. 1, Prop. 2 b)). Let ff be a universally measurable positive function on XX; by Prop. 5 of Ch. V, §3, No. 2 applied to ∫λt dθ(t)\int \lambda_t \, d\theta(t), the mapping t↦λt∙(f)t \mapsto \lambda_t^\bullet(f) is θ\theta-measurable, hence universally measurable in view of the arbitrariness of θ\theta. The formula (12) results from Prop. 5 of Ch. V, §3, No. 2. B) Suppose that there exists a compact subset X′X' of XX carrying the measure ν\nu and such that pX′p_{X'} is continuous: Set T′=p(X′)T' = p(X'), and p′=pX′p' = p_{X'}; let us denote by ν′\nu' the measure νX′\nu_{X'}, and by μ′\mu' the image measure p′(ν′)p'(\nu') on T′T'. Since p′p' is continuous and surjective and since X′X' is compact and metrizable, by A) there exists a mapping Λ′:t′↦λt′′\Lambda' : t' \mapsto \lambda'_{t'} of T′T' into M+(X′)\mathscr{M}_+(X') satisfying the following conditions: a') for every t′∈T′t' \in T', the measure λt′′\lambda'_{t'} is carried by X′∩p‾′(t′)X' \cap \overline{p}'(t'); b') for every universally measurable positive function f′f' on X′X', the function t′↦λt′′∙(f′)t' \mapsto {\lambda'_{t'}}^\bullet(f') is universally measurable on T′T' and

∫X′f′(x′) dν′(x′)=∫T′dμ′(t′)∫X′f′(x′) dλt′′(x′). \int_{X'} f'(x') \, d\nu'(x') = \int_{T'} d\mu'(t') \int_{X'} f'(x') \, d\lambda'_{t'}(x').

Let t∈Tt \in T; if tt belongs to T′T', let us denote by λt\lambda_t the image of λt′\lambda'_t under the canonical injection of X′X' into XX, and if tt belongs to T−T′T - T' we set λt=0\lambda_t = 0. The reader will verify without difficulty that the mapping t↦λtt \mapsto \lambda_t satisfies the conditions a) and b) of the statement.

C) Existence in the general case:

The measure ν\nu on XX being moderated, we may choose a covering (Um)m∈N(U_m)_{m \in \mathbf{N}} of XX consisting of ν\nu-integrable open sets. Let in addition (Xn)n∈N(X_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} be a ν\nu-crushing of XX such that the restriction of pp to each set XnX_n is continuous (§ 1, No. 8, Props. 10 and 11); denote by νn\nu_n the measure φXn⋅ν\varphi_{X_n} \cdot \nu on XX and by μn\mu_n its image under pp. By B) there exists, for every integer n∈Nn \in \mathbf{N}, a mapping t↦αtnt \mapsto \alpha^n_t of TT into M+(X)\mathscr{M}_+(X) satisfying the following conditions:

a′′)a'') The measure αtn\alpha^n_t is carried by p‾(t)\overline{p}(t) for all t∈Tt \in T.

b′′)b'') If ff is a universally measurable positive function on XX, the positive function t↦(αtn)∗(f)t \mapsto (\alpha^n_t)^*(f) on TT is universally measurable and

∫Xf(x) dνn(x)=∫Tdμn(t)∫Xf(x) dαtn(x). \int_X f(x)\, d\nu_n(x) = \int_T d\mu_n(t) \int_X f(x)\, d\alpha^n_t(x).

One has ν=∑n∈Nνn\nu = \sum_{n \in \mathbf{N}} \nu_n and μ=∑n∈Nμn\mu = \sum_{n \in \mathbf{N}} \mu_n; it follows immediately from Prop. 3 of No. 2 and the above Lemma 4 that there exists a sequence (gn)n∈N(g_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} of universally measurable positive functions on TT such that μn=gn⋅μ\mu_n = g_n \cdot \mu for all n∈Nn \in \mathbf{N} and such that ∑n∈Ngn=1\sum_{n \in \mathbf{N}} g_n = 1. For every t∈Tt \in T, let us denote by βtn\beta^n_t the measure gn(t)⋅αtng_n(t) \cdot \alpha^n_t on XX and by qtq_t the encumbrance ∑n∈N(βtn)∗\sum_{n \in \mathbf{N}} (\beta^n_t)^* on XX. Let ff be a universally measurable positive function on XX; using Prop. 2 of No. 2 and summing over nn in (13), we obtain

∫Xf(x) dν(x)=∫Tqt(f) dμ(t); \int_X f(x)\, d\nu(x) = \int_T q_t(f)\, d\mu(t);

it is moreover clear that the function t↦qt(f)t \mapsto q_t(f) on TT is universally measurable.

For every m∈Nm \in \mathbf{N}, let EmE_m be the set of t∈Tt \in T such that qt(Um)=+∞q_t(U_m) = +\infty; the set EmE_m is universally measurable because this is true of the mapping t↦qt(Um)t \mapsto q_t(U_m), and EmE_m is locally μ\mu-negligible by the formula (14) applied to f=φUmf = \varphi_{U_m}, since ν∗(Um)\nu^*(U_m) is finite. The set E=⋃m∈NEmE = \bigcup_{m \in \mathbf{N}} E_m is therefore universally measurable and locally μ\mu-negligible. We set λt=0\lambda_t = 0 for t∈Et \in E. Moreover, let t∈T−Et \in T - E; the encumbrance qtq_t is locally bounded since the open sets UmU_m cover XX and since qt(Um)q_t(U_m) is finite; by Prop. 7 of § 1, No. 7, there exists a measure λt\lambda_t on XX such that qt=λt∗q_t = \lambda_t^* and λt=∑n∈Nβtn\lambda_t = \sum_{n \in \mathbf{N}} \beta^n_t. It is immediate that the mapping t↦λtt \mapsto \lambda_t satisfies the conditions a) and b) of the statement.

D) Proof of c): Let ff be a universally measurable function on XX that is positive and bounded; we are going to show that the universally measurable function hf:t↦λt∙(f)h_f : t \mapsto \lambda_t^\bullet(f) on TT is a density for the measure μf=p(f⋅ν)\mu_f = p(f \cdot \nu) with respect to μ=p(ν)\mu = p(\nu). Let KK be a compact subset of TT and let A=p‾−1(K)A = \overline{p}^{-1}(K). For every t∈Tt \in T, the measure λt\lambda_t is carried by p‾−1(t)\overline{p}^{-1}(t); if tt belongs to KK then p‾−1(t)⊂A\overline{p}^{-1}(t) \subset A, whence λt∙(fφA)=λt∙(f)\lambda_t^\bullet(f \varphi_A) = \lambda_t^\bullet(f); on the other hand, if tt belongs to T−KT - K then p‾−1(t)⊂X−A\overline{p}^{-1}(t) \subset X - A, whence λt∙(fφA)=0\lambda_t^\bullet(f \varphi_A) = 0. Applying the formula (12) to f⋅φAf \cdot \varphi_A,(1)^{(1)} we obtain

μf(K)=∫A∙f(x) dν(x)=∫K∙dμ(t)∫X∙f(x) dλt(x)=∫K∙hf(t) dμ(t), \mu_f(K) = \int_A^\bullet f(x)\, d\nu(x) = \int_K^\bullet d\mu(t) \int_X^\bullet f(x)\, d\lambda_t(x) = \int_K^\bullet h_f(t)\, d\mu(t),

which establishes the relation μf=hf⋅μ\mu_f = h_f \cdot \mu.

Letting f=1f = 1, one sees that the function h1:t↦∥λt∥h_1 : t \mapsto \| \lambda_t \| is a density of the measure μ1=μ\mu_1 = \mu with respect to μ\mu, hence is equal to 1 locally μ\mu-almost everywhere in TT.

E) Uniqueness: Let t↦λtit \mapsto \lambda_t^i (for i=1,2i = 1, 2) be two mappings of TT into M+(X)\mathscr{M}_+(X) satisfying the conditions a) and b) of the statement. As in C), choose a μ\mu-crushing (Xn)n∈N(X_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} of XX such that pXnp_{X_n} is continuous for every n∈Nn \in \mathbf{N}, and set N=X−⋃n∈NXnN = X - \bigcup_{n \in \mathbf{N}} X_n. For every integer n∈Nn \in \mathbf{N}, choose a countable set DnD_n of positive functions on XX, zero outside XnX_n, whose restrictions to XnX_n form a dense set in the normed space C(Xn)\mathscr{C}(X_n) (apply Th. 1 of GT, X, §3, No. 3 to the metrizable compact space XnX_n). We set D=⋃n∈NDnD = \bigcup_{n \in \mathbf{N}} D_n.

Let f∈Df \in D; by D), the functions t↦(λt1)∙(f)t \mapsto (\lambda_t^1)^\bullet(f) and t↦(λt2)∙(f)t \mapsto (\lambda_t^2)^\bullet(f) are densities of the measure μf\mu_f with respect to μ\mu, and so there exists a locally μ\mu-negligible set EfE_f in TT such that (λt1)∙(f)=(λt2)∙(f)(\lambda_t^1)^\bullet(f) = (\lambda_t^2)^\bullet(f) for t∈T−Eft \in T - E_f. Moreover, by (12), the set FiF_i of t∈Tt \in T such that (λti)∙(N)≠0(\lambda_t^i)^\bullet(N) \neq 0 is locally μ\mu-negligible for i=1,2i = 1, 2. Since DD is countable, the set G=(⋃f∈DEf)∪F1∪F2G = (\bigcup_{f \in D} E_f) \cup F_1 \cup F_2 is locally μ\mu-negligible; for t∈T−Gt \in T - G, we have (λt1)∙(N)=(λt2)∙(N)=0(\lambda_t^1)^\bullet(N) = (\lambda_t^2)^\bullet(N) = 0 and (λt1)Xn=(λt2)Xn(\lambda_t^1)_{X_n} = (\lambda_t^2)_{X_n}, whence λt1=λt2\lambda_t^1 = \lambda_t^2 by Prop. 9 of §1, No. 8.

Q.E.D.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.