Lemma 4
Tag 09PI, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09PI].
Integration, IX, p. 38, § 2. Operations on measures
Let be a topological space, a measure on , and a -measurable mapping of into a topological space (Hausdorff or not). There exists a universally measurable mapping of into , equal to locally -almost everywhere.
The proof is identical to that of Prop. 7 of Ch. V, §3, No. 4, on taking into account Prop. 10 of §1, No. 8.
Let us pass to the proof of Prop. 13. A) Suppose that is compact and metrizable and that is continuous and surjective: The space is then compact and metrizable (GT, IX, §2, No. 10). By Th. 1 of Ch. VI, §3, No. 1, there exists a mapping of into , vaguely -measurable and scalarly essentially -integrable, such that and such that has total mass 1 and is carried by for every . Let be a crushing of for , such that the restriction of to each of the sets is continuous (§1, No. 8, Props. 10 and 11); we denote by the mapping of into that is equal to on and to 0 on . It is clear that and that satisfies condition a) of the statement. Let be a measure on ; the mapping is vaguely -measurable and scalarly essentially -integrable, hence also -adequate (Ch. V, §3, No. 1, Prop. 2 b)). Let be a universally measurable positive function on ; by Prop. 5 of Ch. V, §3, No. 2 applied to , the mapping is -measurable, hence universally measurable in view of the arbitrariness of . The formula (12) results from Prop. 5 of Ch. V, §3, No. 2. B) Suppose that there exists a compact subset of carrying the measure and such that is continuous: Set , and ; let us denote by the measure , and by the image measure on . Since is continuous and surjective and since is compact and metrizable, by A) there exists a mapping of into satisfying the following conditions: a') for every , the measure is carried by ; b') for every universally measurable positive function on , the function is universally measurable on and
Let ; if belongs to , let us denote by the image of under the canonical injection of into , and if belongs to we set . The reader will verify without difficulty that the mapping satisfies the conditions a) and b) of the statement.
C) Existence in the general case:
The measure on being moderated, we may choose a covering of consisting of -integrable open sets. Let in addition be a -crushing of such that the restriction of to each set is continuous (§ 1, No. 8, Props. 10 and 11); denote by the measure on and by its image under . By B) there exists, for every integer , a mapping of into satisfying the following conditions:
The measure is carried by for all .
If is a universally measurable positive function on , the positive function on is universally measurable and
One has and ; it follows immediately from Prop. 3 of No. 2 and the above Lemma 4 that there exists a sequence of universally measurable positive functions on such that for all and such that . For every , let us denote by the measure on and by the encumbrance on . Let be a universally measurable positive function on ; using Prop. 2 of No. 2 and summing over in (13), we obtain
it is moreover clear that the function on is universally measurable.
For every , let be the set of such that ; the set is universally measurable because this is true of the mapping , and is locally -negligible by the formula (14) applied to , since is finite. The set is therefore universally measurable and locally -negligible. We set for . Moreover, let ; the encumbrance is locally bounded since the open sets cover and since is finite; by Prop. 7 of § 1, No. 7, there exists a measure on such that and . It is immediate that the mapping satisfies the conditions a) and b) of the statement.
D) Proof of c): Let be a universally measurable function on that is positive and bounded; we are going to show that the universally measurable function on is a density for the measure with respect to . Let be a compact subset of and let . For every , the measure is carried by ; if belongs to then , whence ; on the other hand, if belongs to then , whence . Applying the formula (12) to , we obtain
which establishes the relation .
Letting , one sees that the function is a density of the measure with respect to , hence is equal to 1 locally -almost everywhere in .
E) Uniqueness: Let (for ) be two mappings of into satisfying the conditions a) and b) of the statement. As in C), choose a -crushing of such that is continuous for every , and set . For every integer , choose a countable set of positive functions on , zero outside , whose restrictions to form a dense set in the normed space (apply Th. 1 of GT, X, §3, No. 3 to the metrizable compact space ). We set .
Let ; by D), the functions and are densities of the measure with respect to , and so there exists a locally -negligible set in such that for . Moreover, by (12), the set of such that is locally -negligible for . Since is countable, the set is locally -negligible; for , we have and , whence by Prop. 9 of §1, No. 8.
Q.E.D.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
- X, §3, No. 3 not yet on this site
- § 1, No. 8
- §1, No. 8
- Prop. 10 of §1, No. 8
- Prop. 7 of § 1, No. 7
- Prop. 9 of §1, No. 8
- IX, §2, No. 10
- Prop. 13
- Prop. 2
- Prop. 3
- Prop. 5
- Prop. 7
- V, §3, No. 2
- V, §3, No. 4
- V, §3, No. 1, Prop. 2
- VI, §3, No. 1