Lemma 1
Tag 09P2, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09P2].
Integration, IX, p. 30, § 2. Operations on measures
Let U and V be two compact spaces, h a continuous mapping of U onto V. The mapping of into is then surjective.
For, let a be the linear mapping of into ; since h is surjective, a is an isometry of onto a subspace H of . Let be a positive measure on V; then is a continuous linear form on H, which is extendible to a linear form on with the same norm, by virtue of the Hahn–Banach theorem (TVS, II, §3, No. 2, Cor. 3 of Th. 1); is then a measure on U, and for all , so that . Finally, , and , so that is positive (Ch. V, §5, No. 5, Prop. 9).
Let us now prove the sufficiency of the condition stated in a). The condition implies the existence of a sequence of compact subsets of T, such that the restriction of to each is continuous, and such that, for every , . The sequence can be assumed to be increasing. Set and denote by the measure on , with the convention .
The restriction being continuous, there exists a measure on such that (Lemma 1). Let be the image of under the canonical injection of into T, and let g be an element of . Using successively the fact that is concentrated on , Prop. 4 of §1, No. 5; Prop. 2 of §1, No. 2; Prop. 4 of No. 3, and finally Prop. 7 of No. 3, we have
Taking in this formula, one sees that the family is summable and that its sum is a bounded measure (§1, No. 7, Prop. 7). By Prop. 5 of No. 3, the mapping is -measurable for all , because is continuous, hence -measurable; it follows that is -measurable (§1, No. 7, Prop. 8), hence -proper since is bounded. The above relations then prove that the measures and have the same essential upper integral, hence are equal (§1, No. 2, Cor. of Prop. 2).
Finally, let us assume that is injective, and let us prove b). Let f be an element of ; since is injective, there exists a function such that and, setting , by Prop. 4 of No. 3 we have
The two measures and thus have the same essential upper integral, which implies their equality (§ 1, No. 2, Cor. of Prop. 2).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.