Bourbaki

Lemma 3

Tag 09PC, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09PC].

Integration, chapter IX, § 2. Operations on measures

— Let X be a topological space (Hausdorff or not), f a lower semi-continuous function ⩾0\geqslant 0 defined on X; then f is the limit of an increasing sequence (fn)n∈N(f_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} of lower semi-continuous functions on X, such that each function fnf_n is a linear combination, with positive coefficients, of characteristic functions of open sets.

Given two integers k⩾1k \geqslant 1 and n⩾1n \geqslant 1, let us denote by JknJ_{kn} the characteristic function of the interval ]k/2n,+∞]]k/2^n, +\infty] of R‾\overline{\mathbf{R}}. For every x∈R‾+x \in \overline{\mathbf{R}}_+, set

un(x)=2−n∑k=1n⋅2nJkn(x); u_n(x) = 2^{-n} \sum_{k=1}^{n \cdot 2^n} J_{kn}(x);

it is immediate that the sequence (un(x))n⩾1(u_n(x))_{n \geqslant 1} is increasing and admits x as limit. The sequence of functions fn=un∘ff_n = u_n \circ f is therefore increasing and converges to ff, and one has fn=2−n∑k=1n⋅2nφU(k,n)f_n = 2^{-n} \sum_{k=1}^{n \cdot 2^n} \varphi_{U(k,n)}, where U(k,n)U(k,n) is the open set f−1([k/2n,+∞])f^{-1}([k/2^n, +\infty]) of XX.

Let us pass to the proof of b). The function IfI_f being the upper envelope of the increasing directed family of functions IfLI_f^L, where LL runs over the set of compact subsets of TT (Lemma 2), it will suffice to show that the functions IfLI_f^L are lower semi-continuous; the formula (9) may then be deduced from (6) by passing to the upper envelope over LL (§ 1, No. 6, Prop. 5).

Thus let H\mathscr{H} be the set of positive lower semi-continuous functions ff on S×TS \times T such that IfLI_f^L is lower semi-continuous for every compact subset LL of TT. By Prop. 5 of § 1, No. 6, the supremum of every increasing directed set of elements of H\mathscr{H} belongs to H\mathscr{H}. By Lemma 3, it will therefore suffice to prove that the characteristic function of an open set WW of S×TS \times T belongs to H\mathscr{H}. Moreover, by the definition of the product topology on S×TS \times T, the open set WW is the union of an increasing directed family (Wα)α∈A(W_\alpha)_{\alpha \in A} of open sets of the form

W=⋃1≤i≤n(Ui×Vi), W = \bigcup_{1 \leq i \leq n} (U_i \times V_i),
where the UiU_i are open in SS and the ViV_i are open in TT; by the remarks made above, it will suffice to show that the characteristic function of such an open set belongs to H\mathscr{H}. Let then s∈Ss \in S, and let UU be the intersection of the family (possibly empty) formed by the open sets UiU_i containing ss; one sees immediately that φW(s,t)≤φW(s′,t)\varphi_W(s,t) \leq \varphi_W(s',t) for all s′∈Us' \in U and t∈Tt \in T, whence, by integration, IφWL(s)≤IφWL(s′)I_{\varphi_W}^L(s) \leq I_{\varphi_W}^L(s') for all s′∈Us' \in U. Consequently IφWLI_{\varphi_W}^L is lower semi-continuous, and the proposition is established.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.