Theorem 5 (Levi–Malcev)
Tag 0A0G, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0A0G].
Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter I, § 6. Semi-simple Lie algebras
A Lie algebra always has a Levi subalgebra . Every Levi subalgebra of is the image of under a special automorphism.
Let denote the radical of . We first treat two special cases.
(a) .
By Proposition 5, is then the product of its centre by which is semi-simple. Hence is a Levi subalgebra. Moreover, if is a semi-simple subalgebra, then (Theorem 1), hence and is the unique Levi subalgebra of .
(b) and the only ideals of contained in are and .
Then and the centre of is zero. Let (resp. ) be the subspace of consisting of the linear mappings of into whose restriction to is a homothety (resp. zero); is therefore of codimension 1 in . For , let denote the ratio of the homothety of defined by . Let be the representation of on canonically derived from the adjoint representation; recall that for all and all .
Clearly for all . Moreover, if and , then
As the centre of is zero, the mapping defines a bijection of onto a subspace of . This subspace is stable under and contained in since is a commutative ideal and (5) shows that for . The representation of on derived from is therefore zero on and defines a representation of the semi-simple algebra on . For all , the space is contained in , which is of codimension 1 in . Consequently (no. 2, Lemma 3) there exists such that and for all . The mapping is a linear mapping of into . By (5) its restriction to is the identity mapping of . Hence its kernel is a subspace of supplementary to in . As is the set of such that , is a subalgebra of and therefore a Levi subalgebra of .
Let be another Levi subalgebra. For all , let be the unique element of such that . Since is a subalgebra and is commutative, for in :
(c) General case:
We argue by induction on the dimension of the radical. There is nothing to prove if and hence it can be assumed that the theorem holds for Lie algebras whose radical is of dimension . By (a) it suffices to consider the case where . As is nilpotent (no. 4, Proposition 6), its centre is . Let be a minimal non-zero ideal of contained in . If , we have case (b). Therefore let and let be the canonical mapping of onto . The radical of is . By the induction hypothesis, has a Levi subalgebra . Then is a subalgebra of g containing m such that h/m = h' is semi-simple and hence having m as radical. By the induction hypothesis h = m + s where s is a semi-simple subalgebra. Then the equality g' = r' + h' implies g = r + h = r + m + s = r + s and hence s is a Levi subalgebra of g.
Let s' be another Levi subalgebra of g. Then f(s) and f(s') are two Levi subalgebras of g' and there exists by the induction hypothesis a' ∈ [g', r'] such that e^{ad\alpha'}(f(s')) = f(s). If a ∈ [g, r] is such that f(a) = a', it follows that:
s_1 = e^{ada}(s') \subset m + s = h.
Then s_1 and s are two Levi subalgebras of h and by the induction hypothesis there exists b ∈ m such that e^{adb}(s_1) = s. Hence s = e^{adb}.e^{ada}(s'). Finally, as m is in the centre of [g, r], e^{adb}.e^{ada} = e^{ad(b+a)} and b + a ∈ [g, r], which completes the proof.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
- Exercise 1, § 6
- Corollary 1, § 6
- Corollary 3, § 6
- Proposition 1, § 7
- Proposition 31, § 9
- Exercise 11, § 3
- Proposition 7, § 5