Bourbaki

Theorem 5 (Levi–Malcev)

Tag 0A0G, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0A0G].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter I, § 6. Semi-simple Lie algebras

A Lie algebra gg always has a Levi subalgebra ss. Every Levi subalgebra of gg is the image of ss under a special automorphism.

Let rr denote the radical of gg. We first treat two special cases.

(a) [g,r]={0}[g, r] = \{0\}.

By Proposition 5, gg is then the product of its centre rr by Dg\mathscr{D}g which is semi-simple. Hence Dg\mathscr{D}g is a Levi subalgebra. Moreover, if s′s' is a semi-simple subalgebra, then s′=Ds′s' = \mathscr{D}s' (Theorem 1), hence s′⊂Dgs' \subset \mathscr{D}g and Dg\mathscr{D}g is the unique Levi subalgebra of gg.

(b) [g,r]≠{0}[g, r] \neq \{0\} and the only ideals of gg contained in rr are {0}\{0\} and rr.

Then [g,r]=r, [r,r]={0}[g, r] = r,\ [r, r] = \{0\} and the centre of gg is zero. Let MM (resp. NN) be the subspace of L(g)\mathscr{L}(g) consisting of the linear mappings of gg into rr whose restriction to rr is a homothety (resp. zero); NN is therefore of codimension 1 in MM. For m∈Mm \in M, let λ(m)\lambda(m) denote the ratio of the homothety of rr defined by mm. Let σ\sigma be the representation of gg on L(g)\mathscr{L}(g) canonically derived from the adjoint representation; recall that σ(x).u=[adgx,u]\sigma(x).u = [\mathrm{ad}_g x, u] for all x∈gx \in g and all u∈L(g)u \in \mathscr{L}(g).

Clearly σ(x)(M)⊂N\sigma(x)(M) \subset N for all x∈gx \in g. Moreover, if x∈r,y∈gx \in r, y \in g and u∈Mu \in M, then

(σ(x).u)(y)=[x,u(y)]−u([x,y])=−λ(u)[x,y] (\sigma(x).u)(y) = [x, u(y)] - u([x, y]) = -\lambda(u)[x, y]
since [r,r]={0}[r, r] = \{0\}; and (4) can be written:
(x).u=−ad(λ(u).x). (x).u = -\mathrm{ad}(\lambda(u).x).

As the centre of gg is zero, the mapping x↦adgxx \mapsto \mathrm{ad}_g x defines a bijection ϕ\phi of rr onto a subspace PP of L(g)\mathscr{L}(g). This subspace is stable under σ(g)\sigma(g) and contained in NN since rr is a commutative ideal and (5) shows that σ(x)(M)⊂P\sigma(x)(M) \subset P for x∈rx \in r. The representation of gg on M/P=VM/P = V derived from σ\sigma is therefore zero on rr and defines a representation σ′\sigma' of the semi-simple algebra g/rg/r on VV. For all y∈g/ry \in g/r, the space σ′(y)(V)\sigma'(y)(V) is contained in N/PN/P, which is of codimension 1 in VV. Consequently (no. 2, Lemma 3) there exists u0∈Mu_0 \in M such that λ(u0)=−1\lambda(u_0) = -1 and σ(x).u0∈P\sigma(x).u_0 \in P for all x∈gx \in g. The mapping x↦ϕ−1(σ(x).u0)x \mapsto \phi^{-1}(\sigma(x).u_0) is a linear mapping of gg into rr. By (5) its restriction to rr is the identity mapping of rr. Hence its kernel is a subspace ss of gg supplementary to rr in gg. As ss is the set of x∈gx \in g such that σ(x).u0=0\sigma(x).u_0 = 0, ss is a subalgebra of gg and therefore a Levi subalgebra of gg.

Let s′s' be another Levi subalgebra. For all x∈s′x \in s', let h(x)h(x) be the unique element of rr such that x+h(x)∈sx + h(x) \in s. Since ss is a subalgebra and rr is commutative, for x,yx, y in s′s':

[x+h(x),y+h(y)]=[x,y]+[x,h(y)]+[h(x),y]∈s [x + h(x), y + h(y)] = [x, y] + [x, h(y)] + [h(x), y] \in s
hence
h([x,y])=(ad x).h(y)−(ad y).h(x). h([x, y]) = (\mathrm{ad}\, x).h(y) - (\mathrm{ad}\, y).h(x).
By Remark 2 of no. 2, there exists a∈ra \in r such that h(x)=−[x,a]h(x) = -[x, a] for all x∈s′x \in s'. Then:
x+h(x)=x+[a,x]=(1+ad a).x. x + h(x) = x + [a, x] = (1 + \mathrm{ad}\, a).x.
As rr is commutative, (ad a)2=0(\mathrm{ad}\, a)^2 = 0 and hence 1+ad a=ead a1 + \mathrm{ad}\, a = e^{\mathrm{ad}\, a}. As r=[g,r]r = [g, r], ead ae^{\mathrm{ad}\, a} is a special automorphism of gg. By (6) this special automorphism maps s′s' to ss.

(c) General case:

We argue by induction on the dimension nn of the radical. There is nothing to prove if n=0n = 0 and hence it can be assumed that the theorem holds for Lie algebras whose radical is of dimension <dim⁡r< \dim r. By (a) it suffices to consider the case where [g,r]≠{0}[g, r] \neq \{0\}. As [g,r][g, r] is nilpotent (no. 4, Proposition 6), its centre cc is ≠{0}\neq \{0\}. Let mm be a minimal non-zero ideal of gg contained in cc. If m=rm = r, we have case (b). Therefore let m≠rm \neq r and let ff be the canonical mapping of gg onto g′=g/mg' = g/m. The radical of g′g' is r′=r/mr' = r/m. By the induction hypothesis, g′g' has a Levi subalgebra l′l'. Then b=f(l′)b = f(l') is a subalgebra of g containing m such that h/m = h' is semi-simple and hence having m as radical. By the induction hypothesis h = m + s where s is a semi-simple subalgebra. Then the equality g' = r' + h' implies g = r + h = r + m + s = r + s and hence s is a Levi subalgebra of g.

Let s' be another Levi subalgebra of g. Then f(s) and f(s') are two Levi subalgebras of g' and there exists by the induction hypothesis a' ∈ [g', r'] such that e^{ad\alpha'}(f(s')) = f(s). If a ∈ [g, r] is such that f(a) = a', it follows that:

s_1 = e^{ada}(s') \subset m + s = h.

Then s_1 and s are two Levi subalgebras of h and by the induction hypothesis there exists b ∈ m such that e^{adb}(s_1) = s. Hence s = e^{adb}.e^{ada}(s'). Finally, as m is in the centre of [g, r], e^{adb}.e^{ada} = e^{ad(b+a)} and b + a ∈ [g, r], which completes the proof.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.