Bourbaki

Proposition 6

Tag 0A00, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0A00].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter I, § 6. Semi-simple Lie algebras

Let g be a Lie algebra, r its radical and s its nilpotent radical. (a) s=[g,r]=Dg∩rs = [g, r] = \mathscr{D}g \cap r. (b) s is the intersection of the orthogonals of g with respect to the bilinear forms associated with the finite-dimensional representations of g.

Clearly [g,r]⊂Dg∩r[g, r] \subset \mathscr{D}g \cap r. Now Dg∩r=s\mathscr{D}g \cap r = s by Theorem 1 of § 5, no. 3. Let g′=g/[g,r]g' = g/[g, r] and f be the canonical homomorphism of g onto g′g'; then f(r)f(r) is the radical r′r' of g′g' (Corollary 3 to Proposition 2, no. 2), hence [g′,r′]={0}[g', r'] = \{0\} and r′r' is the centre of g′g'; therefore (Proposition 5) g′g' has a finite-dimensional faithful semi-simple representation, whence s⊂[g,r]s \subset [g, r]. This proves (a).

Let t be the intersection of the orthogonals of g with respect to the bilinear forms associated with the finite-dimensional representations of g. Then s⊂ts \subset t (§ 4, no. 3, Proposition 4 (d)). On the other hand, g/sg/s has a finite-dimensional faithful semi-simple representation and hence (Proposition 5) a finite-dimensional representation ρ\rho such that the associated bilinear form is non-degenerate; considered as a representation of g, ρ\rho has an associated bilinear form β\beta on g and the orthogonal of g with respect to β\beta is s, whence t⊂st \subset s. Hence t=st = s.

Even if s≠{0}s \neq \{0\} there may exist non-degenerate symmetric bilinear forms on g (Exercise 18 (c)). Such forms, of course, are not associated with any representation of g.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.