Bourbaki

Proposition 10

Tag 0AHK, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AHK].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter III, § 7. Lie groups over an ultrametric field

Suppose that p≠0p \neq 0. Let GG be a finite-dimensional Lie group. Let GfG_f be the set of x∈Gx \in G for which there exists a strictly increasing sequence (ni)(n_i) of integers such that xnix^{n_i} tends to ee as ii tends to +∞+\infty. (i) GfG_f is open in GG. (ii) There exists one and only one mapping ψ\psi of GfG_f into L(G)L(G) with the following properties: (a) ψ(xn)=nψ(x)\psi(x^n) = n \psi(x) for all x∈Gfx \in G_f and all n∈Zn \in \mathbf{Z}; (b) there exists an open neighbourhood VV of ee in GG such that ψ∣V\psi|V is the inverse mapping of an injective exponential mapping. (iii) The mapping ψ\psi is analytic.

There exists an open subgroup of GG which is isomorphic to a standard group (no. 3, Theorem 4). Assertion (i) then follows from Lemma 1.

Let UU be an open subgroup of L(G)L(G) and ϕ:U→ϕ(U)\phi : U \to \phi(U) an exponential mapping of GG with the properties of Proposition 3 of no. 2. UU can be assumed to be small enough for ϕ(U)⊂Gf\phi(U) \subset G_f. Let x∈Gfx \in G_f. There exists m∈Z−{0}m \in \mathbf{Z} - \{0\} such that xm∈ϕ(U)x^m \in \phi(U). The element 1mϕ−1(xm)\frac{1}{m} \phi^{-1}(x^m) does not depend on the choice of mm. For let m′∈Zm' \in \mathbf{Z} be such that xm′∈ϕ(U)x^{m'} \in \phi(U). Then xmm′∈ϕ(U)x^{m m'} \in \phi(U) and

m′ϕ−1(xm)=ϕ−1(xmm′)=mϕ−1(xm′) m' \phi^{-1}(x^m) = \phi^{-1}(x^{m m'}) = m \phi^{-1}(x^{m'})
whence our assertion. Let ψ(x)=1mϕ−1(xm)\psi(x) = \frac{1}{m} \phi^{-1}(x^m). Then ψ∣ϕ(U)=ϕ−1\psi|\phi(U) = \phi^{-1}. On the other hand, if n∈Zn \in \mathbf{Z}, then
ψ(xn)=1mϕ−1(xnm)=nmϕ−1(xm)=nψ(x). \psi(x^n) = \frac{1}{m} \phi^{-1}(x^{nm}) = \frac{n}{m} \phi^{-1}(x^m) = n \psi(x).

Hence ψ\psi has properties (a) and (b) of the proposition. In a neighbourhood of xx, ψ\psi is composed of the mappings x↦xmx \mapsto x^m, y↦ϕ−1(y)y \mapsto \phi^{-1}(y) and z↦1mzz \mapsto \frac{1}{m} z; hence ψ\psi is analytic on GfG_f.

Finally, let ψ′\psi' be a mapping of GfG_f into L(G)L(G) and V′V' a neighbourhood of ee in GfG_f such that ψ′(xn)=nψ′(x)\psi'(x^n) = n \psi'(x) for x∈Gfx \in G_f and n∈Zn \in \mathbf{Z} and such that ψ′∣V′\psi'|V' is the inverse mapping of an injective exponential mapping. Then ψ\psi and ψ′\psi' coincide on a neighbourhood WW of ee. If x∈Gfx \in G_f, there exists n∈Zn \in \mathbf{Z} such that xn∈Wx^n \in W. Then

nψ′(x)=ψ′(xn)=ψ(xn)=nψ(x) n \psi'(x) = \psi'(x^n) = \psi(x^n) = n \psi(x)
and hence ψ=ψ′\psi = \psi'.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.