Bourbaki

Proposition 14

Tag 0AHR, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AHR].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter III, § 7. Lie groups over an ultrametric field

Suppose that p≠0p \neq 0 and that v is chosen such that v(p)=1v(p) = 1. Let G be a standard group and E(X) (resp. L(X)) the expansion of the exponential function of G (resp. the logarithmic function of G) as an integral series about 0.

(i) The domain of absolute convergence (Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 4.1.3) of E contains the set Δ\Delta of x∈Gx \in G such that ω(x)>1p−1\omega(x) > \frac{1}{p-1}. Let E′E' denote the mapping defined on Δ\Delta by this series. Then E′E' is an exponential mapping of G and is an isomorphism of the manifold Δ\Delta onto itself.

(ii) The domain of absolute convergence of L contains G. Let L′L' denote the mapping on G defined by this series. Then L′L' is the logarithmic mapping of G and the restriction of L′L' to Δ\Delta is the inverse mapping of E′E'.

(iii) The mapping E′E' is an isomorphism of Δ\Delta, with the Hausdorff law, onto the subgroup Δ\Delta of G.

Using the notation of § 5, nos. 3 and 4, E=∑m≥1ψm,mm!E = \sum_{m \geq 1} \frac{\psi_{m,m}}{m!} (§5§ 5, no. 4, Proposition 3). As the coefficients cαβγc_{\alpha \beta \gamma} belong to A, ∥ψm,m∥≤1\| \psi_{m,m} \| \leq 1 (Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, Appendix) KrK^r is assumed to have the norm

∥(λ1,…,λr)∥=sup⁡(∣λ1∣,…,∣λr∣) \| (\lambda_1, \ldots, \lambda_r ) \| = \sup(|\lambda_1|, \ldots, |\lambda_r|)

By Chapter II, § 8, no. 1, Lemma 1, v(m!)≤m−1p−1v(m!) \leq \frac{m-1}{p-1}. If ω(x)>1p−1\omega(x) > \frac{1}{p-1}, we see that mω(x)−v(m!)m \omega(x) - v(m!) tends to +∞+\infty with mm, whence

∥ψm,mm!∥∥x∥m≤1∣m!∣∥x∥m \left\| \frac{\psi_{m,m}}{m!} \right\| \|x\|^m \leq \frac{1}{|m!|} \|x\|^m
which tends to 0 as mm tends to +∞+\infty and
ω(ψm,m(x)m!)>mp−1−m−1p−1=1p−1for m≥1. \omega\left( \frac{\psi_{m,m}(x)}{m!} \right) > \frac{m}{p-1} - \frac{m-1}{p-1} = \frac{1}{p-1} \quad \text{for } m \geq 1.
Therefore Δ\Delta is contained in the domain of absolute convergence of EE and E′(Δ)⊂ΔE'(\Delta) \subset \Delta. Clearly E′E' is an exponential mapping.

If LmL_m denotes the homogeneous component of LL of degree mm, Proposition 3 of § 5, no. 4, proves that each coefficient of LmL_m is of the form

a1+12a2+⋯+1mam a_1 + \frac{1}{2} a_2 + \cdots + \frac{1}{m} a_m
with a1,a2,…,ama_1, a_2, \ldots, a_m in AA; but
inf⁡(v(1),v(12),…,v(1m))=o(log⁡m)as m tends to +∞ \inf \left( v(1), v\left( \frac{1}{2} \right), \ldots, v\left( \frac{1}{m} \right) \right) = o(\log m) \quad \text{as } m \text{ tends to } +\infty
and
inf⁡(v(1),v(12),…,v(1m))≥v(1m!)≥−m−1p−1. \inf \left( v(1), v\left( \frac{1}{2} \right), \ldots, v\left( \frac{1}{m} \right) \right) \geq v\left( \frac{1}{m!} \right) \geq -\frac{m-1}{p-1}.
Therefore, if ω(x)>0\omega(x) > 0, ∥Lm∥⋅∥x∥m\|L_m\| \cdot \|x\|^m tends to 0 as mm tends to +∞+\infty, so that GG is contained in the domain of absolute convergence of LL. On the other hand, if ω(x)>mp−1\omega(x) > \frac{m}{p-1}, then ω(Lm(x))>mp−1−m−1p−1=1p−1\omega(L_m(x)) > \frac{m}{p-1} - \frac{m-1}{p-1} = \frac{1}{p-1} for m≥1m \geq 1 and hence L′(Δ)⊂ΔL'(\Delta) \subset \Delta.

As the formal power series L(E(X))L(E(X)) and E(L(X))E(L(X)) are equal to XX, no. 4.1.5 of Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, proves that

L′(E′(x))=E′(L′(x))=x L'(E'(x)) = E'(L'(x)) = x
for x∈Δx \in \Delta. Hence E′E' is an isomorphism of the manifold Δ\Delta onto itself and the inverse isomorphism is the restriction of L′L' to Δ\Delta.

L(X[n])=nL(X)L(X^{[n]}) = nL(X) for nn an integer >0> 0 (cf. § 5, no. 4). As GG is contained in the domain of absolute convergence of LL and X[n]X^{[n]}, therefore L′(xn)=nL′(x)L'(x^n) = nL'(x) for all x∈Gx \in G. The relation L′∣Δ=E′−1L'|_{\Delta} = {E'}^{-1} implies that L′(xn)=log⁡xnL'(x^n) = \log x^n for nn sufficiently large. Hence L′(x)=log⁡xL'(x) = \log x. We have thus proved (i) and (ii).

Let H=∑r,s≥0Hr,sH = \sum_{r,s \geq 0} H_{r,s} be the Hausdorff formal power series and hh the Hausdorff function relative to L(G)L(G). The domain of absolute convergence of H~\tilde{H} contains Δ×Δ\Delta \times \Delta and hh is defined on Δ×Δ\Delta \times \Delta (Chapter II, § 8, Proposition 2). Then

E′(x)E′(y)=E′(h(x,y)) E'(x)E'(y) = E'(h(x, y))
for x,yx, y sufficiently close to 0 (§4§ 4, Theorem 4 (v)). Hence, in the notation of no. 3, Definition 1, the formal power series F(E(X),E(Y))F(E(X), E(Y)) and E(H(X,Y))E(H(X, Y)) are equal. Let x,yx, y be elements of Δ\Delta. Then
sup⁡m∣ψm,mm!∣(sup⁡∥x∥,∥y∥)m<1sup⁡r,s∥Hr,s∥∥x∥r∥y∥s<∣ρ∣1/(p−1) \sup_m \left| \frac{\psi_{m,m}}{m!} \right| (\sup \|x\|, \|y\|)^m < 1 \\ \sup_{r,s} \|H_{r,s}\| \|x\|^r \|y\|^s < |\rho|^{1/(p-1)}
by Chapter II, § 8, formula (14). By Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 4.1.5, E′(x)E′(y)E'(x)E'(y) is obtained by substituting xx for XX and yy for YY in
F(E(X),E(Y)) F(E(X), E(Y))
and E′(h(x,y))E'(h(x, y)) is obtained by substituting xx for XX and yy for YY in E(H(X,Y))E(H(X, Y)). Hence E′(x)E′(y)=E′(h(x,y))E'(x)E'(y) = E'(h(x, y)).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.