Suppose that p=0 and that v is chosen such that v(p)=1. Let G be a standard group and E(X) (resp. L(X)) the expansion of the exponential function of G (resp. the logarithmic function of G) as an integral series about 0.
(i) The domain of absolute convergence (Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 4.1.3) of E contains the set Δ of x∈G such that ω(x)>p−11. Let E′ denote the mapping defined on Δ by this series. Then E′ is an exponential mapping of G and is an isomorphism of the manifold Δ onto itself.
(ii) The domain of absolute convergence of L contains G. Let L′ denote the mapping on G defined by this series. Then L′ is the logarithmic mapping of G and the restriction of L′ to Δ is the inverse mapping of E′.
(iii) The mapping E′ is an isomorphism of Δ, with the Hausdorff law, onto the subgroup Δ of G.
Using the notation of § 5, nos. 3 and 4, E=∑m≥1m!ψm,m (§5, no. 4, Proposition 3). As the coefficients cαβγ belong to A, ∥ψm,m∥≤1 (Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, Appendix) Kr is assumed to have the norm
∥(λ1,…,λr)∥=sup(∣λ1∣,…,∣λr∣)
By Chapter II, § 8, no. 1, Lemma 1, v(m!)≤p−1m−1. If ω(x)>p−11, we see that mω(x)−v(m!) tends to +∞ with m, whence
m!ψm,m∥x∥m≤∣m!∣1∥x∥m
which tends to 0 as m tends to +∞ and
ω(m!ψm,m(x))>p−1m−p−1m−1=p−11for m≥1.
Therefore Δ is contained in the domain of absolute convergence of E and E′(Δ)⊂Δ. Clearly E′ is an exponential mapping.
If Lm denotes the homogeneous component of L of degree m, Proposition 3 of § 5, no. 4, proves that each coefficient of Lm is of the form
a1+21a2+⋯+m1am
with a1,a2,…,am in A; but
inf(v(1),v(21),…,v(m1))=o(logm)as m tends to +∞
and
inf(v(1),v(21),…,v(m1))≥v(m!1)≥−p−1m−1.
Therefore, if ω(x)>0, ∥Lm∥⋅∥x∥m tends to 0 as m tends to +∞, so that G is contained in the domain of absolute convergence of L. On the other hand, if ω(x)>p−1m, then ω(Lm(x))>p−1m−p−1m−1=p−11 for m≥1 and hence L′(Δ)⊂Δ.
As the formal power series L(E(X)) and E(L(X)) are equal to X, no. 4.1.5 of Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, proves that
L′(E′(x))=E′(L′(x))=x
for x∈Δ. Hence E′ is an isomorphism of the manifold Δ onto itself and the inverse isomorphism is the restriction of L′ to Δ.
L(X[n])=nL(X) for n an integer >0 (cf. § 5, no. 4). As G is contained in the domain of absolute convergence of L and X[n], therefore L′(xn)=nL′(x) for all x∈G. The relation L′∣Δ=E′−1 implies that L′(xn)=logxn for n sufficiently large. Hence L′(x)=logx. We have thus proved (i) and (ii).
Let H=∑r,s≥0Hr,s be the Hausdorff formal power series and h the Hausdorff function relative to L(G). The domain of absolute convergence of H~ contains Δ×Δ and h is defined on Δ×Δ (Chapter II, § 8, Proposition 2). Then
E′(x)E′(y)=E′(h(x,y))
for x,y sufficiently close to 0 (§4, Theorem 4 (v)). Hence, in the notation of no. 3, Definition 1, the formal power series F(E(X),E(Y)) and E(H(X,Y)) are equal. Let x,y be elements of Δ. Then