Bourbaki

Proposition 17

Tag 0AVB, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AVB].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VI, § 1. Root systems

Assume that RR is reduced and let w∈Ww \in W and α∈R\alpha \in R.

(i) We have ψ(w(α))=Uw(ψ(α))\psi(w(\alpha)) = U_w(\psi(\alpha)). (ii) Assume that α\alpha is positive. The root w(α)w(\alpha) is negative if and only if

η(w−1,sα)=−1, \eta(w^{-1}, s_{\alpha}) = -1,
in other words if sα∈Tw−1s_{\alpha} \in T_{w^{-1}}.

(iii) We have η(w,sα)=−1\eta(w, s_\alpha) = -1 if and only if the chambers C and w(C)w(C) are on opposite sides of the hyperplane LαL_\alpha. In other words, the set TwT_w consists of the reflections with respect to the walls separating C and w(C)w(C).

Let β∈B(C)\beta \in B(C) and put s=sβs = s_\beta. Clearly Ts={s}T_s = \{ s \} and consequently

Us(ε,t)={(ε,sts−1)if t≠s(−ε,s)if t=s. U_s(\varepsilon, t) = \begin{cases} (\varepsilon, st s^{-1}) & \text{if } t \neq s \\ (-\varepsilon, s) & \text{if } t = s. \end{cases}

On the other hand, let ρ=∑γ∈B(C)nγ(ρ)γ\rho = \sum_{\gamma \in B(C)} n_\gamma(\rho) \gamma be a positive root. Put

s(ρ)=∑γ∈B(C)nγ(s(ρ))γ. s(\rho) = \sum_{\gamma \in B(C)} n_\gamma(s(\rho)) \gamma.

If ρ≠β\rho \neq \beta, there exists an element γ∈B(C)\gamma \in B(C) with γ≠β\gamma \neq \beta, such that nγ(ρ)>0n_\gamma(\rho) > 0, and we have nγ(s(ρ))=nγ(ρ)>0n_\gamma(s(\rho)) = n_\gamma(\rho) > 0 (no. 1, formula (5)). Hence s(ρ)s(\rho) is positive. We deduce immediately that

ψ(s(ε,ρ))={(ε,ssρs−1)if ρ≠β(−ε,s)if ρ=β. \psi(s(\varepsilon, \rho)) = \begin{cases} (\varepsilon, ss_\rho s^{-1}) & \text{if } \rho \neq \beta \\ (-\varepsilon, s) & \text{if } \rho = \beta. \end{cases}

Comparison of (12) and (13) now shows that Us(ψ(γ))=ψ(s(γ))U_s(\psi(\gamma)) = \psi(s(\gamma)) for all roots γ\gamma and all s∈Ss \in S. Since S generates W, (i) follows.

On the other hand, saying that w(α)w(\alpha) is negative is equivalent to saying that

ψ(w(α))=(−1,wsαw−1), \psi(w(\alpha)) = (-1, ws_\alpha w^{-1}),

or, by (i), that Uw(ψ(α))=(−1,wsαw−1)U_w(\psi(\alpha)) = (-1, ws_\alpha w^{-1}). If in addition α\alpha is positive, then ψ(α)=(+1,sα)\psi(\alpha) = (+1, s_\alpha) and Uw(ψ(α))=(η(w−1,sα),wsαw−1)U_w(\psi(\alpha)) = (\eta(w^{-1}, s_\alpha), ws_\alpha w^{-1}), hence (ii).

Finally, by (ii), η(w,sα)=−1\eta(w, s_\alpha) = -1 if and only if one of the roots α\alpha and w−1(α)w^{-1}(\alpha) is positive and the other negative. This is equivalent to saying that (α∣x).(w−1(α)∣x)=(α∣x).(w∣x)<0(\alpha|x).(w^{-1}(\alpha)|x) = (\alpha|x).(w|x) < 0 for all x∈Cx \in C, hence the first assertion in (iii). The second assertion in (iii) follows immediately.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.