Proposition 10
Tag 0B4K, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0B4K].
General Topology, chapter I, § 6. Filters
If is an ultrafilter base on a set and if is a mapping of into a set , than is an ultrafilter base on .
Let be a subset of . If contains a set of , then contains ; if not, then contains a set of (no. 4, Proposition 5) and therefore contains . Hence the result follows from Proposition 6 of no. 4.
Consider in particular the case where is the canonical injection of a subset of a set . If is a filter base on then is a filter base on . The filter on generated by is called the filter generated by when is considered as a filter base on . If is an ultrafilter base on it is also an ultrafilter base on by reason of Proposition 10.
Let us next examine whether the inverse image of a filter base is a filter base. Let be a filter base on a set , and let be a mapping of a set into ; then is a filter base on if and only if for each . This is an immediate consequence of the relation and of Definition 3 of no. 3. This condition can also be expressed by saying that every set of meets [or that the trace of on is a filter base]. If this condition is satisfied, then is a base of a filter finer than the filter of base .
If is a filter base on it is clear that the above condition is satisfied by is then a base of a filter coarser than the filter of base .
Let be a subset of a set , the canonical injection ; if is a filter base on then is the same as . If we express this as a filter base of by means of the above condition, we recover part of Proposition 8 of no. 5.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.