Bourbaki

Proposition 9

Tag 0BBW, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BBW].

General Topology, chapter I, § 11. Connectedness

The component of any point in a topological space XX is a closed set. The relation "y belongs to the component of x" is an equivalence relation R{x,y}R \{ x, y \} on XX, and the equivalence classes are the components of XX. The quotient space X/RX/R is totally disconnected.

The first part of the proposition is an immediate consequence of Definition 3 and the fact that the closure of a connected set is connected (no. 1, Proposition 1). Since the union of connected sets which have a point in common is connected (no. 1, Proposition 2), the relation RR is transitive, hence is an equivalence relation (since it is obviously reflexive and symmetric) and the equivalence class of xx with respect to RR is the component of xx. It remains to show that X/RX/R is totally disconnected. Let f:X→X/Rf : X \to X/R be the canonical mapping, and let FF be a closed set in X/RX/R containing at least two distinct points; the inverse image f−1(F)f^{-1}(F) of FF is closed in XX, saturated with respect to RR, and contains at least two distinct components of XX and hence is not connected. Hence there exist two non-empty closed sets B,CB, C in XX such that B∩C=∅B \cap C = \varnothing and B∪C=f−1(F)B \cup C = f^{-1}(F). The component of any point xx of f−1(F)f^{-1}(F) in f−1(F)f^{-1}(F) is the same as the component of xx in XX (by the definition of RR) and therefore BB and CC, which are both open and closed in f−1(F)f^{-1}(F), are saturated with respect to RR. Hence f(B)f(B) and f(C)f(C) are closed in X/RX/R, and f(B)∪f(C)=Ff(B) \cup f(C) = F and f(B)∩f(C)=∅f(B) \cap f(C) = \varnothing; this shows that FF is not connected and consequently that X/RX/R is totally disconnected.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.